Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, PortaJohn said:

Seeds #1 O'Toole #2 Mesenbrink #3 Ramirez #4 Carr # 5 Hamiti?

if this is how it shakes out (seems likely) id rather be the 2 lol

  • Fire 1

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted
3 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

sloppy shot by Carr Keegans gotten a lot quicker to the corner

Plus, he buried him with hips on the second shot.

Keegan with the sermon from the Ecclesiastes. That dude better mute this B4 his head explodes.

Posted
1 minute ago, PortaJohn said:

Seeds #1 O'Toole #2 Mesenbrink #3 Ramirez #4 Carr # 5 Hamiti?

could see the seeding committee putting Carr over Ramirez since they can move within one of what the formula spits out

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted
Just now, CHROMEBIRD said:

Who do you like in a KOT-Hamiti scramble?

Keegan beat him 8-1 or 9-2 when they wrestled in the all star match last year although I think Hamiti has gotten better

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted
Just now, Truzzcat said:

could see the seeding committee putting Carr over Ramirez since they can move within one of what the formula spits out

Ramirez has the head to head

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
Just now, PortaJohn said:

Ramirez has the head to head

yeah that definitely makes it hard to do that as the committee I just don't know they want KOT vs Carr in the semis but I may be projecting because I also do not want that.

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted

That was a fun match. Carr took a bad shot and paid for it, but I'd love to see that match 10 more times. It's technical, strategic and chaotic all at the same time. 

165 at NCAAs is going to be amazing. 

  • Bob 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

yeah that definitely makes it hard to do that as the committee I just don't know they want KOT vs Carr in the semis but I may be projecting because I also do not want that.

No one wants it but you can't punish Ramirez for winning the head to head and winning his conference.  That's part of the formula they use for seeding

Edited by PortaJohn
  • Fire 1

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

How will they seed 165 at NCAA's? O'Toole. Mesenbrink ,Carr ,Ramirez then Hamiti ?

Caliendo will also be trouble on whichever side of the bracket he lands

Posted
1 minute ago, CHROMEBIRD said:

Caliendo will also be trouble on whichever side of the bracket he lands

I think the whole bracket will be trouble know matter who you are. It should some great wrestling.

  • Bob 2
Posted

plot twist they give MM the 1 seed which actually makes his path significantly more difficult 

 

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted

If KOT runs the table he will have more than likely beaten the big 10 champ at both 165 and 174 wonder if anyone has beaten two big 10 champs of that year in the same season.

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted
1 minute ago, MinnesotaMustang said:

I agree. If Carr has to be #4 due to loss to Ramirez, make MM #1 and KOT #2. 

Does Ramirez' loss to Olejnik ding his seed?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Lisa Pastoriza

    Wyoming Seminary, Arizona
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Tiffin (Women)
    Projected Weight: 103

    Nyvaeh Wendt

    Mason County Central, Michigan
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Siena Heights (Women)
    Projected Weight: 131

    Rhees Hatch

    Bear River, Utah
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Hastings (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160

    Giada Cucchiara

    Platte County, Missouri
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Baker (Women)
    Projected Weight: 138

    Sophia Marshall

    Rosewood, North Carolina
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Mount Olive (Women)
    Projected Weight: 207
×
×
  • Create New...