Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Why so many Sun Devils starters out of projected line up?

  PROJECTED LINEUP: NO. 6 ARIZONA STATE (0-0)
125: Richard Figueroa
133: 4/4 Michael McGee -OR- Julian Chlebove
141: 19/23 Jesse Vasquez -OR- Cody Foote
149: 6/4 Kyle Parco
157: Max Wilner
165: Tony Negron
174: Josh Nummer -OR- Cael Valencia
184: 17/22 Anthony Montalvo
197: Jonathon Fagen
HWT: David Palosika

 

Edited by feet2back
Posted
9 minutes ago, feet2back said:

Why so many Sun Devils starters out of projected line up?

  PROJECTED LINEUP: NO. 6 ARIZONA STATE (0-0)
125: Richard Figueroa
133: 4/4 Michael McGee -OR- Julian Chlebove
141: 19/23 Jesse Vasquez -OR- Cody Foote
149: 6/4 Kyle Parco
157: Max Wilner
165: Tony Negron
174: Josh Nummer -OR- Cael Valencia
184: 17/22 Anthony Montalvo
197: Jonathon Fagen
HWT: David Palosika

 

Yeah not sure what's up with sending only half the starters, but as a silver lining, I'm excited to see Figueroa in action

Posted

Using what each school projected as it's starter and Wrestlestat projects a 25-6 Rutgers victory.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Using what each school projected as it's starter and Wrestlestat projects a 25-6 Rutgers victory.

Funny, I came up with a score of Rutgers 22 - Arizona State 14 with the listed ASU starters vs the Rutgers starters.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Thumper said:

Funny, I came up with a score of Rutgers 22 - Arizona State 14 with the listed ASU starters vs the Rutgers starters.

Breakdown?  I will show you mine if you show me yours. 😅

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Breakdown?  I will show you mine if you show me yours. 😅

Just as it is outlined above (and below here)

125 - Figueroa

133 - McGee

141 - Vasquez

149 - Parco

157 - Wilner

165 - Negron

174 - Nummer

184 - Montalvo

197 - Fagen

285 - Palosika

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 14-05-09 Rutgers vs #6 Arizona State on Saturday.png

Edited by Thumper
Posted
11 minutes ago, Thumper said:

Just as it is outlined above (and below here)

125 - Figueroa

133 - McGee

141 - Vasquez

149 - Parco

157 - Wilner

165 - Negron

174 - Nummer

184 - Montalvo

197 - Fagen

285 - Palosika

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 14-05-09 Rutgers vs #6 Arizona State on Saturday.png

I meant your match by match scoring projection.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

Is that Bronco? Wasn't he our "west coast correspondent." :classic_rolleyes:

The handwriting samples are very similar. 

  • Haha 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
16 hours ago, nhs67 said:

I meant your match by match scoring projection.

Not mine - WrestleStat's.  You do know how to use WrestleStat's dual comparison feature don't ya?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Thumper said:

Not mine - WrestleStat's.  You do know how to use WrestleStat's dual comparison feature don't ya?

Listen here, you dolt... I am asking for your breakdown or what your 'projection' for a match be match would be. 😂😂😂😂😝

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, nhs67 said:

Listen here, you dolt... I am asking for your breakdown or what your 'projection' for a match be match would be. 😂😂😂😂😝

Your own words here you DOLT  "Using what each school projected as it's starter and Wrestlestat projects a 25-6 Rutgers victory."

Quote

 

 

Posted
Just now, Thumper said:

Your own words here you DOLT  "Using what each school projected as it's starter and Wrestlestat projects a 25-6 Rutgers victory."

 

First off, Bronco, my dolt comment was meant as a joke - hence the laughy-smiley tongue-thing-emoji.

Second off, I did use it.  I asked you for your own personal, though.

You are our west coast expert.  I want to see your projected lineup and your own prediction.  That is what I meant by 'What is your match by match breakdown?'

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, nhs67 said:

First off, Bronco, my dolt comment was meant as a joke - hence the laughy-smiley tongue-thing-emoji.

Second off, I did use it.  I asked you for your own personal, though.

You are our west coast expert.  I want to see your projected lineup and your own prediction.  That is what I meant by 'What is your match by match breakdown?'

FIFY 

  • Haha 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
2 minutes ago, SunDevil said:

Nice top 20 win for Figs in his first career college match. 

I thought he would beat SHawyer by 4-5 ... closer match than I thought. 

  • Fire 1

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Posted
10 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

That's my fault ho. I should have just shut up. To be fair I commented, "West Coast correspondent." 

Isn't 'expert' sort of synonymous?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, MPhillips said:

If you believe correspondent's are experts...

In today's world the FNM would make you believe so.

When are the finals for the Tiger Style Invite?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted

Man the freshman Soldano techs Montalvo.... that was surprising. 

Alvarez turned it up 3rd round

ASU team will look much different later in the season. I am guessing that since Norfleet got cleared at the end of summer that he is still not full strength. 

Sponsored by INTERMAT ⭐⭐⭐⭐

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...