All Activity

Nope, absolutely not. I've already said what Obama did was wrong, so you'll have to present an actual justification instead of a lame "whataboutism" (shout out @Interviewed_at_Weehawken)

I'll make it even more clear so you can maybe see where your mistake is and get a tiny bit smarter today. AOC = X The Squad = Y Me: X does this. You: But Y doesn't do that. Me: Yes, that's why I said *X* does that, not *Y* does that.

It’s ok for them to assassinate us citizens right?

Open mouth, insert foot. LMAO.

You just said socialists, like the squad, don't tow the party line, so which is it?

OH. MY. GOD. LMAO. I'll try to help you one more time. Me: AOC often tows the party line now. You: I watched a video of a squad member (not AOC) not towing the party line. Me: Yeah, that's why I didn't say "the squad." I said "AOC" specifically.

You realize a socialist is nothing more than a patient communist.

Wow...if true...YIKES!! He has shown over and over that he is a terrible governor and would have been an even worse VP. Curious, does anyone on here actually like Walz and think he is doing a good job??

Except you said they all are now. You’re easily the kid that can’t get passed third grade

Sure! And that's exactly why I can vote for a socialist and hate Democrats! Because *socialists* don't tow the *Democrat* party line. I feel like an elementary school teacher.

To me if they have the data it’s like taking out the criminals running the terrorists from Iran.

Except the one I watched wasn’t AOC sooooooo. You ASSumed again

Those are exactly the type of boats they typically use. You should watch To Catch a Smuggler: Tropical Takedown. Reality show about catching the drug runners and the type of boats they use. Besides, you are assuming that it's the only boat they are using. As for bombing of the alleged cartel members from Venezuela, as much as I want to see those criminals taken down, not sure I am in agreement with indiscriminately just bombing the boat. My hope is that there were extenuating circumstances that called for this to happen, but if not, I don't think it is a "good thing" so to speak.

Maybe not your grandma but you’re a piece of cake.

So close! The word "specifically" means "in a way that is exact and clear; precisely." So when I "specifically" wrote AOC, as you note, I am talking *about AOC* and *not the other squad member* you talked about.

Smacked around? LMAO. Please explain. Your old and feeble unemployed self couldn't smack around my grandma. You could smack Trump around, but that's not saying much. You'd breathe on him and he'd probably fall over.

Ummmmmm the squad are all socialists and AOC isn’t towing any party line like you said she is.

I'll help you out. "I just watched a video of one of the squad members. Far from towing the party line." Translation: There is a significant difference between that member of the squad and the Dem party line. [Correct] "You hate democrats yet voted for a self proclaimed socialist?" Yes, because, as you correctly noted, there is a difference between the Dem party line and socialist politics, which is why I am willing to vote for *some* candidates running as Democrats (such as Bernie or Zohran) while not supporting the overall Dem Party.

Except that Coach Grey has answered all the questions (look for the Cornell article on Flo) about why these guys are sitting out. Ivy League prohibits grad students from competing, requires enrolled students to make progress towards graduation, and counts enrollment towards eligibility limits. A number of presumed starters (Diakomihalis, Saunders, Ungar, maybe Cornella) have to not be enrolled this semester to meet these requirements, which is in keeping with prior actions going back at least to Dylan Palacio. Shapiro is limiting his competitions to protect his health (not clear, and not important if he is enrolled or not). I would speculate that Cornella is sitting out this semester, and will sit out first semester in 2026 as well, in order to have two more competitive seasons available: second semester 2026 and second semester 2027.

Yep. We do. You’re a prime example of the crisis

You did specify them. Specifically AOC

No, I was always against them. I just didn't have an account to condemn them ON HERE. And then I said I was pretty sure I had condemned them on here anyway, even years after the fact. We have a reading comprehension crisis in this country.

That would be more on your inability to comprehend

Ole RV a little sore from getting smacked around last night. It seems to be getting easier and easier to prove you wrong.

In your other post, you just acknowledged everything I said as correct without realizing it lmao.