Dogbone

It seems to be just speculation based on him missing his best competition dates this year (CKLV and Little Rock).

New lines for the week: Prebyterian +22.5 v. VMI Edinboro +18.5 v. Lock Haven Bloomsburg +30.5 v. Navy Kent St. +4.5 v. Cleveland St. Columbia +1.5 v. Bucknell NCST +6.5 v. VT MSU +15.5 v. CMU Brown +14.5 v. Harvard UNI -28.5 v. Wisonsin UNC -4.5 v. Stanford Nebraska -27.5 v. Purdue

He is also just making up things and stating them as fact like Schultz's cuts 50+ pounds....

They have Gallagher beating Peterson so it doesn't seem like they do.

MM only won by major in that match in the dual and did not break him at the NCAA's "only" beating Amine 6-1. The dual loss was the only match Amine has lost by bonus in his career. Caliendo has been very impressive this year outside of the MM match, but the chances to bonus Amine still seem very low.

New lines starting to pop up: Penn +6.5 v. Rutgers (today) OkSt -1.5 v. Iowa (Sunday)

Not pinned: Cael Sanderson

We did not watch the same match, I guess. Starocci was never threatened once. Starocci is getting Techs against B1G competition and NCAA qualifiers. Ferrari can't tech the SDSU backup. Its a different level.

Looks like he is just coaching to me. He doesn't even seem that passionate about it. Both are bad calls, but I don't want my coach to just accept it, especially if they were on the wrong side of the first one. If anything, it would be consistent for Poeta to point out that the Sealey's TD was no different than Bryd's and they should be called the same, which was incorrectly no TD unfortunately.

Where did he complain or make a comment about the Sealey TD?

That is where I disagree. Majoring Plott just means he is the contender at the 2nd level of 184 (3rd place). It does not mean anything with regards to his ability to beat the other 2.

Exactly! It has nothing to do with who the calls go against or any fan base because there have been so many questionable calls. He is like an athlete that chokes in big moments. Sure is is fine with no one is around but when the moment gets big, his brain does bizarre things.

Yes, there can be more than two title contenders but there is not at 184 this season. I'm sorry, Plott is very good and in a different year or weight class he has the ability to win a NC, but he is just level below the top two guys.

There have been a lot of good duals this year where the dual outcome was not in doubt but had a lot of toss up matches. This dual does not seem to have a lot of toss ups, but the dual is a toss up with bonus points likely deciding the difference. Just interesting to me.

Refs are not supposed to be known. The fact that he is the most well known and recognized ref tells you all you need to know. I don't know the name of another NCAA ref nor could I recognize one in street clothes, but I can with Angel.