Jump to content

NotThatDave

Members
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NotThatDave

  1. You serious, Clark?!
  2. I'm of the (completely ignorant) opinion Vito still isn't 100%. He obviously wasn't at Final X, and I suspect he didn't make the strides he needed to since then. Give me Jax in two.
  3. It's probably spelled correctly, but we've all been saying it incorrectly the entire time. It's actually pronounced like "Kyle." Then we get a whole Garry, Jerry, Barry, Larry, Terry storyline... :
  4. Not enough of Tyler talking about cartoons on here, though...
  5. He's thinking about what goofy face he's going to make for the YouTube thumbnail. At least it's thought-out. Justin just makes the same generic grin every time and tries to pass it off as authentic.
  6. ...for some of us, maybe.
  7. The spit-sucking and mouth-breathing makes it unlistenable.
  8. "Oklahoma" is not hard to spell.
  9. Don't forget the mocking of the practice of prayer!
  10. I still hate this thread.
  11. I've seen about all I can see from Brayden Thompson. I doubt he factors in this season.
  12. Seems like a bold pick for Ryder to even wrestle at 174.
  13. It was insanely funny. But... "I was high on the Raneys until they didn't pick Iowa" is an insanely stupid take.
  14. Wow! SIX whole D1 programs!? Thanks Title IX...
  15. Just for S & G's then, if teams were seeded according to last season's finals points, the first round matchups would be as follows (giving Minnesota the tiebreaker over Ohio State because of their head-to-head-dual result): (1) Nebraska vs (16) Wyoming (8) Northern Iowa vs (9) Ilinois (4) Minnesota vs (13) Lehigh (5) Ohio State vs (12) Missouri (2) Oklahoma State vs (15) Arizona St (7) North Carolina State vs (10) Virginia Tech (3) Iowa vs (14) Arkansas-Little Rock (6) Cornell vs (11) Michigan
  16. Now that tickets are on sale to the general public, it seems like the next step is to seed the teams. If they are using the previous season's NCAA team scores to qualify teams for the lottery, wouldn't it make the most sense to just seed them the same way? Take out the subjectivity completely. How else should they do it? Or is seeding all irrelevant anyway, because TO BE THE MAN, YOU'VE GOT TO BEAT THE MAN?!
  17. I didn't know this was a children's forum.
  18. Singlet-pull effect > butterfly effect
  19. "could have gone" "could have been posted"... As long as we're critiquing each other, use correct grammar.
  20. I can't believe my favorite Jimmy post isn't even an option! Hamiti favored over Mesenbrink?
×
×
  • Create New...