Scouts Honor

i said: anyone here illegally already committed a crime you immediately poo poohed the crime i didn't say they should be arrested.. though perhaps that isn't a bad idea...might deter a few, if they have to be inconvenienced and processed... so as to catch them a second time which isn't just a misdemeanor. also remember seeking asylum doesn't work the way we are allowing it to happen

ok, so what are YOU talking about. WE have been talking about people crossing the border. other than over staying a visa, how does one become present in a country without crossing the border without being detected.

https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-criminalisation-of-migrants-annex_en.pdf

by contrast Simply put, illegal immigration is a felony under Mexican law. In fact, Article 123 of the General Law of Population mandates that “a penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five hundred thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.”

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for apprehending individuals attempting to enter the United States illegally. The United States Border Patrol is its mobile uniformed law enforcement arm, responsible for deterrence, detection and apprehension of those who enter the United States without authorization from the government or outside the designated ports of entry.

The first offense is a misdemeanor according to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which prohibits non-nationals from entering or attempting to enter the United States at any time or place which has not been designated by an immigration officer, and also prohibits non-nationals from eluding inspection by ...

at least some of them are having it done TO them

they have tried actually. but anyway... Isreal took out the generals that coordinated the attacks with hamas on Oct. 7th Anyone interested in Middle east terrorism and isreali response, should read the book VENGEANCE i forget the author but it was written about 1986. It is about the change in isreali attitude toward terrorism. Up until 1972, Isreal always acted in defense, and reaction. After Munich , (of which there is a very good account of the brutaility fo those days in the book) and about 5 years of escalating attacks leading up to it, the isrealis changed their attitude to going on the offensive and seeking out known coordinators.

homicides... how many? how many were due to trans 'hate' accidental poisonings?

oops

some of you know my first name. I get mail all the time addressed to Ms or Mrs. When i was a kid I got all kinds of beauty pageant information. I thought I should send my picture in to see if they thought I could win. It doesn't bother me. well that's not entirely correct... one time i made a decision based on someone not remembering.

to be fair, it started in the late 40's

if only isreal would stop attacking hospitals right? you mean, where hamas is hiding people and weapons.

oh yes.. isreal that one time

what exactly are they doing wrong? i believe they are doing what they should have a long time ago... eradicating hamas.

exactly. go back to the late 1940's... when they BEGAN to try push isreal into the sea. but they still can't do it. who has broken every cease fire in the history of isreal?

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/california-homelessness-spending-audit-24b-five-years-didnt-consistently-track-outcomes/

lol..isreal running wild

its time to get over yourself. i admitted i shouldn't have said he didn't deserve the spot

it's pretty obvious isn't it... that dake didn't do much... he couldn't hit his wrap... even on lesser opponents. people figured it out. it's called film study. now he did still place 2nd. good. but if he is still relying on the wrap. he didn't learn. perhaps i was a bit overboard on saying he doesn't deserve the spot. but if he made no improvements ... then im not wrong. If he has made improvements than good on him. i will root for whoever gets the spot.

he's never seen cloward-piven

so were bin laden still be alive.. and he came here he would not be a security risk?

he did offer a reason you allude to it in the parentheses