RockLobster

Then - Maybe stop posting like an a**hole toward me. It'd go a long way toward repairing the damage you've done to our communication, and others on this board.

... still hurts you when the picture fits another one of your basket of deplorables. Maybe its a cult, maybe its just a bunch of weirdos, but whatever your group is all about - it helps nobody here.

... and now you look even sillier. AI is on my side. Male humans can give birth. If you want to fight with AI - you go, girl.

Checked your post against current AI... "Can male humans give birth?" Turns out you're wrong. AI says so.

I'm going to stop well short of requiring certification and licensing for potential parents, but it is something to consider when you realize the weight and responsibility of the effort and responsibility they will be undertaking. I'm just not sure people making the decision to induce pregnancy are making the right choice. What about the child? Who protects the child when the parents neglect them? Abuse them? When the parents divorce? I'm re-thinking the certification and licensing idea - maybe there should be a law to protect the children.

You were replying to my post. Mine was not a biological query, but a modern societal commentary. And, yes, my post included a reference to someone who felt strongly that humans did, in fact, live solely to reproduce. Here it is again in case you've forgotten. In this day and age, the concept that women should be expected to be primarily "baby-making-machines" is completely unacceptable. Modern day cavemen that believe and promote the notion should be rebuked (yes, the current VP nominee for the R's)

I've had my problems with you. But this is different... you are INCREDIBLY UNINFORMED AND STUPID HERE. It is NOT "one or the other" in roughly 1 in 1,500 births There are roughly 10,500 births in the US ever day. The math tells us roughly (7) kids are born each day that cannot be assigned a sex based on observation. These kids have their own sets of problems. I'd like to think uninformed people don't need to pile more problems on them. That's cruel and awful. Why not just leave the kids alone to figure it out with their parents and loved ones. Leave the kids alone.

Well - "msaprt", you've used the word "projection" (often incorrectly) multiple times in reference to my posts. Now you've decided to use "hypocrisy." Glad to see your <Dipshit-to-English> dictionary is still partially functioning. You and your nutty buddies are comical. Seriously. Why are you wasting time picking a fight with me? I'm not defending Palestine. Never have. I despise terrorists and terrorism, across the board. Without exception. Go away, your schtick is old and tired.

I would politely disagree with your suggestion. He is always starving for headlines. He embraces his chaos and crazy to get headlines. Don't try to shift this on to any other group... it's just Donald and his narcissism that needs the constant attention. That's not the kind of leader we need. We don't need more crazy and chaos, we need more normal and united.

That is a complete bullshit post - but so weakly done, I can't imagine who you think you're fooling!? I never said anything nearly close to "well, you are right" because - it's clear that "you are 100% wrong." I made it clear, his policies were about doing diddly squat as president other than attempting to fill his pockets with taxpayer money. Oh, and bringing his entire family into "positions" in his administration so he could fill their pockets as quickly as he could fill his own. Why you keep trying to peddle lies is something I don't' understand. Scroll up and read my post, the TRUTH is there. "Building that wall that never got built" "Draining the swamp that he only made bigger" "Making peace in the middle east - until he ordered the murder of Iran's beloved and top military leader (which we're still paying the price for.) He had no policies other than the wall, the swamp, and (maybe) the peace effort. Which all failed miserably. The rest was behavior that could never be considered presidential by any measure. His policies failed, his re-election effort failed, his legal efforts failed - he's now a multiple time convicted felon. Fact is that Donald is and was a complete and total loser.

It's interesting that you pointed this out. A friend in Utah once told me that women should be committed to using all of their eggs as optimally and as long as possible. Similarly, that men should never masturbate because it would waste their seed. It is interesting to realize that some people actually think women should be baby-making-machines. (Think of all those eggs/lives that she purposely killed by not taking advantage of them!)

His behaviors are what I posted... BUT the telling part is that is all he had. He had literally ZERO other POLICIES. Donald liked to talk but it was only talk. He liked to talk up building that wall that never got built. And draining the swamp that he only made bigger. And making peace in the middle east - until he ordered the murder of Iran's beloved and top military leader (which we're still paying the price for.) Donald's behavior as a president was unforgivably bad. Nobody in their right mind wants that again. Any notion of "his policies" being good is complete bullshit. His only halfway decent 'policies' were those of the Republican party that he signed off on like a monkey with his eyes closed.

Trying out words from your shiny new "<dipshit>-to-English" dictionary today, mspart? Good for you. You go girl. Now don't be thinking I'm changing the subject... I would gladly continue if your last couple posts made enough sense to be able to follow. It appears your shiny new dipshit dictionary has got you unglued from any semblance of logic. I'm sure you'll try to get it together soon. You're basket of deplorable brethren depend on you. Best of luck.

That wasn't a post meant for you. It was directed to mspart (the poster I was responding to.) This particular post didn't include you, didn't affect you and had nothing to do with you at all. Btw, do you know what a narcissist? (Someone that thinks everything is about them!)

You've got that one right. Donald is the equivalent of a monkey swinging a stick. Bad advice, good advice, whatever. The monkey just likes to swing that stick. He'd appoint a bird to whatever, just as long as they let Donald play with his stick and make himself feel grand.

OK, slow down. Who is this "HE" you are referring to? I assumed you meant Donald. Obviously he can't be trusted. If you actually meant Wray, then he was clear about it being either a bullet OR a bullet fragments. No wriggle room. He was clear.

You keep saying that in your posts. And I keep replying to it. What the hell are these "policies" of Trump are you a fan of exactly: Waking up to breakfast and watching morning TV while Tweeting meaningless nonsense every day? Rolling into the Oval Office around noon-ish. Signing everything the Republican majority Senate sends his way without thought or consideration. Not involving himself with anything that Congress is doing except signing the (R) supported items like a monkey. Organizing his multiple day rallies where he can speak like a crazy person a couple times a month. Organizing his multiple weekly golfing trips where he wanders like a chunky old man pretending to be good. Increasing the rates in his hotels, and recommending visiting dignitaries so he can cash in. Dealing with all his personal businesses, which he refused to separate from his commitment as president. Advising his kids double dipping in both personal business and their highly paid 'positions' in the White House. Cool that you're a fan of his policies. But it seems to me, you aren't really looking at them through a clear lens.

I don't disagree with you here. I'll simply re-iterate. Unpredictable, half-crazy and half senile. That is the recipe for chaos that none of us need. I'd vote for a younger Republican, no doubt. But can't vote for more half-crazy chaos. That's the wrong direction.

Yep - we've known that all day. Some of us longer than others. But good on you for paying attention to actual facts that are recent and relevant. Nicely done. (That wasn't sarcasm, I actually meant it.)

Exactly. HE SAID means nearly nothing. Pinch the top of your ear. You'll find out there are very few nerve endings there. Could the nerve endings from the top of your ear clearly differentiate between a small caliber bullet and a fragment of a small caliber bullet fired at high speed? No. It's simply not possible to make that differentiation based on feel. (Not that reality would ever stop a phony like HIM to make an outlandish claim that he wants to be true.)

You target me specifically with petty little post, and now you want to defend it as if it didn't happen. I don't have a problem with you as a poster - except your unwillingness to take any responsibility. No projection. You posted what you posted. Why run and hide from it.

You're confusing me with... you.

She was willing to bend over backwards to make him look good... yet he wouldn't let her help him. He'd be much better at golfing in retirement than anything he's doing now.