Ban Basketball

Cliff Keen/Las Vegas Invite https://unipanthers.com/news/2022/12/3/wrestling-panther-wrestling-cklv-invite-final.aspx

Keep in mind: you asked, "who opposes equality?" Keep that thought in mind-you didn't earlier-and it will all reveal itself to you (I can only hope). You can say that they opposed it on any grounds that you or they wish to, but the fact of the matter is that you asked who's opposed to equality. Those 36 are, religious reasons or not. So, when do they start advocating killing people on the Sabbath? Say all you want about felons "making the choice" (plea bargains, actual cases of innocence be damned), but the fact of the matter is that one loses significant rights in the U.S., once convicted of a felony. Hence, if you support it, you don't support equality for all, as you're still a citizen with a felony. Say all you want about Deuce and his minions, but if you wanted to see millions of votes thrown out, you didn't support equality in voting. Say all you want about elections laws, but the fact of the matter is that the 30 percenters-you included-want to actually make voting MORE restrictive and MORE difficult by the various acts of legislation limiting the opportunities to vote. So, when ONE PERSON is not able to vote in this country and you support the reason(s) why that happened, you support inequality in voting, just like the 30 percenters. Still waiting for one conservative/30 percenter/Republican to understand the inequity in the taxation system. You fall into EXACTLY the same foolish, deliberately misinformed trap as them all. Sorry to do it in bold, but it's a must: DUE TO CAPITAL GAINS RATES AND ENDLESS OTHER LOOPHOLES DISPROPORTINATELY BENEFITTING MILLIONAIRES AND BILLIONAIRES, THOSE INDIVIDUALS, ON AVERAGE PAY A LESSER PERCENTAGE OF THEIIR INCHUM IN TAXES THAN DO MIDDLE INCHUM FOLKS. Do you pay single digits or less on your inchum taxes? The folks listed above do. So, yes, you and the 30 percenters support tax/inchum inequality by being fooled by Tattletale "News" and AM radio. If you don't support equity for those with disabilities, well, I don't know what to say, but I feel sorry for the folks who suffer the consequences of those of you who feel your able-bodyism should give you privilege over my niece and my aunt. Shall we re-visit this gem, which you must have found so endearing?

You don't know me from over twenty years ago, my friend. The more you ignore me, the more I flourish. I don't want nor need ya lip, so I do BEST and will post like mad when left alone. Ang, yes, I AM a basketball fan too. Can't get one by you, can I, Columbio?!

Oh, you old nostalgia buff, you. Misogyny? I'll let my friends on here enjoy the irony in your post, given that I don't know the sex of the person who was antagonizing me; the person could be either male or female. So, why did YOU immediately assume that the person is a male and not a female? Make some pretty misogynous and stereotypical assumptions there, my friend.

Yes, as but one great example. Class warfare has now become librul elites out of touch with the working man.

You beat me to it. I'd also add that they don't really stand for anything, other than opposing whatever Democrats support.

Can't get one by you, can I, Columbio?!

As Leon Russell used to sing, " if the shoe fits, wear it." Had she not shot her mouth off, none of this would have happened.

That's killer! I've always known that I need to listen to them, especially being someone who (tries to) plays the banjo.

I got an easy fix for yis second paragraph: stop engaging me and I'll be of no bother to you. "All news is biased...I would never say that all news is biased."-Nailbiter.

Don't expeck you to, but, boy, will I EVER have fun using your own words against you! LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, with whom was I betting, boy? What were we betting on, boy? Watch this, friends.

Yet, you didn't, did you, after asking me repeatedly to do so. "I never said there was not bias in the news... all news is biased. "- Nailbiter.

Just copy and paste the passage where we agreed on the final conditions. If you can pernt out where we both agreed, I will happily pay the other party. I want it posted here, so that others who may care as much as you curiously do can verify it too. Got it, boy? Good...

Got a copy of the transcript yet, boy? What were we betting on, boy? If not, giddy on, boy, and start digging. As an FYI, the other party has been given the offer, and has yet to get back to me. So, perhaps you're wasting your time, boy?

Show me the specific passage through a link or copying and pasting where we both agreed on the final conditions. Thanks!

Gone over the transcript yet, boy? Got a conclusion on it yet, boy? If not, you've got work to do, boy. Zip ta yap.

Are you going to look over there trabscript and inform me where we agreed on the conditions of the best, boy? If not, then what do you keep crying about, boy? Look it up and tell us where. Otherwise, zip ya yap.

You asked, didn't you, boy? If you don't like the answer, boy, then zip ya yap, boy. If you want to look over the bet and find where we agreed on the conditions of the bet, have at it, boy. Let me know where you found the agreeance, and I'll pay up, boy. Sound fair, boy? Good...

Well, those two teams regularly win in those environments, so it's real in two instances. No, I owe no one anything. First, we never agreed on the conditions of the bet, which was easy to see from the transcripts. Second, I also made several offers to the individual that if he could show me where the conditions were agreed upon by both of us beforehand, I'm an honest man and I'll pay up. I never heard back, but the offer is still there. Good to see that you've moved on, Butch.

I'm not speaking for the person you're asking the question to, but I think I have a pretty good perspective on home field advantage. For one, I've never really believed in it, simply because statistics don't bear it out very well. However, and with that said, there are two places where it is very real. One is rasslin against the Sqwawkers at Carver Sqwawkeye arena, and, two, playing the Packers at home in January. My only two exceptions.

It's precisely because of these nonsensical "discussions" that I firmly believe that it should be criminal for any news/"news" agency to deliberately lie and mislead people (as the best example, content analysis found that Tattletale "News" lies or misleads in over 60% of their "stories), just as I believe it should be criminal for elected officials to deliberately lie to constituents. It would put an end to these alternate realities that get fed to people all day, every day.

Obstruction is where the criminality was found. There may have been other areas, but I don't recall. Lots of colluding too, but I'm not sure that's illegal, in and of itself.

False. Had you read the report, Mueller detailed eight different areas where Deuce obstructed justice during the investigation. Had you read the report you also would have learned that Mueller said that it was not his job to bring these criminal charges but Congress' job to do so. So, yes, LOTS of criminal wrongdoing, in addition to Lock Him Up Flynn's conviction for lying to the FBI about his Russian colluding.

Ah, ok. So, you repeatedly said that there is no such thing as unbiased news, and then proceed to demand an example. I provide two, then use all of your own words against you, and you don't watch the news clips. Of course you didn't. Of course you didn't... "The kind of news you describe doesn't exist...I never said all news is biased. "- Nailbiter.