ThreePointTakedown

Can I just claim something as true then make you do the research to prove me wrong? It’s so easy being intellectually lazy. No wonder y’all love it so much. FYI, self reporting studies are unreliable. Anyone that doesn’t realize it probably self report as on the ‘smarter’ end of the spectrum.

Y’all were obviously tricked by a habitual lying, racist, nepo baby as the truth telling, freedom-loving, hero of the working class orangutan. Someone who wouldn’t relieve themselves on you if you were on fire. But insist they have your interest in mind. All y’all’s cog diss is off the charts. But keep attacking smart and capable women of color. That is a great look and definitely will put you on the right side of history.

Classic conservative talking points. Accuse the other side of what you’re guilty of before they can do it. Funny how the anti education party keeps getting tricked by their leaders(who all went to Harvard, Yale, and Penn) to vote against their own interest. Y’all are clueless and scared and begging to be led by anyone that thinks, speaks, and/or looks like you. Validating your moronic opinions and promising to punish the brown people that are the ‘real’ reason their lives are so tough.

I declare myself the winner. Cuz y’all are weak AF! Go back and continue to rationalize your dumb ass opinions. That’s all you’re good at. Seriously what or who convinced you that trying to prove a point like this is effective. Like it worked on you but you never thought about how you became convince. (Whispers to self) of course you didn’t that’s why we’re here. Get better arguments or at least better process to vet information. Because the orange leader is getting on in years. I don’t think they’ll be around too long. You’ll need a new source of immutable truth.

…up to a point. DUH! This makes you unserious and dishonest. But as long as you can hand wave away any push back so you don’t have to self reflect. Prior to that what was her privilege as a black girl/women from Chicago? Born 6 months before anyone in her family had the right to vote. Your eye rolling only highlights your privilege in having/needing the interest to take 60seconds to search and understand how difficult people other than you might have/had it. But I used the P word. So you don’t have to read anymore. You’ve seen enough.

You didn’t look up the word irony obviously. You’re whole retort was you trying to stay relevant in a subject you know nothing about. Considering her work in the WH was to try to help encourage good/healthy eating and exercise habits for everyone, why would you want her to go away? Stay in the spot light to emphasize those qualities. Do you have something else against her that you wouldn’t want someone to remind us to eat healthier? I wonder what that could be. Have you even thought about it or do you just live on knee jerk reactions? If RFKJ wasn’t such a nut job and was actually interested in the health and safety of people I would love for him to shout it from the roof tops if/when he’s out of politics. Seems like your dislike is based on something different, thoughts?

Pivot! your claim was challenged. You can’t back it up. I just watched the video. Nothing like what you claimed was said. So you lied. Your ‘common sense’ which, can we agree means: ‘how I put things together’, was wrong. You want something to be true so you twisted something into a pretzel to make it seem like it if I just ‘trusted you, bruh’. what do you do next? change the subject. Move the goal posts. DARVO! or just admit you were mistaken or lied and become smarter in your process. why is this so difficult? Don’t you want to be smarter? Isn’t that a goal of yours?

Define irony: a group of anonymous people who undoubtedly had more privilege than this women had up to a point in her life(although they’d never admit it or even self reflect on that point), now complain and attempt to shame her that after working hard and getting quite lucky in her life she voices any issues that she had in the WH. nope, you’re not emotional snowflakes. Definitely not.

That quote doesn’t confirm the numbers you sited. If you watched the speech/presser, site the time stamp where those numbers were mentioned?

Whose tax plan did that to you?

No one sited you as privileged or called you names. Just that someone that uses those terms could be seen as such. If you’re taking offense to a hypothetical then you’re admitting you might fall within it. I made no claim as such. Read more carefully and leave your emotions out of it. Yes. Certain terms were in fact ‘definitions’. Appealing to the legality is lazy. It IS dehumanizing calling someone an alien. is there a reason you want to continue to see these particular humans as ‘less than’? Because insisting on outdated terminology has a history and not a good one. Not unlike the pro-nouns debacle of the early 20’s. It comes off like a child putting their fingers in their ears and screaming ‘I DON’T WANNA!’ You just look sad and out of touch.

Reposting a lie over and over doesn’t make it true. when you post the source of the different numbers you’ve sited then I’ll take it more seriously.

Did you confirm that this number is accurate?

Obviously those protesters were paid by the right. So they can’t be trusted to actually represent chicagoians. So there’s no reason to believe anything about this story. Frustrating isn’t it? DARVO cannot ever build anything of substance. It can only destroy. who do we know of that has not and boasted that they will never take accountability for anything? (Hint, 45-47) Anyone that supports or follows a hollow person like that is in a cult. I hope that doesn’t describe you.

Are definitions descriptive or prescriptive?

1st point: Burden, how do? Agreed. Not all, most, or even a plurality of U-I fall into that category tho.

47 likes to pardon obvious criminals. If U-I are in fact criminals why not just pardon them for the good of the country. To ‘bring us all together’.

Firstly, no it isn’t. It’s a semantic question that doesn’t address the topic. secondly, for the same reason we stop using slurs for all other groups. It’s dehumanizing. Making it easier to treat them as ‘less than’. Unless that is your goal. To propose solutions to a problem without having the burden of thinking of them as similar to you in anyway. It tells us how unserious you are in addressing the issue. Tells us that you intend to treat them with as little compassion and empathy as possible. Flexing your privilege for no other reason than because you can. If that is the case, it makes you a monster. If not, you’re just a bigot. *not saying that you think or feel this way. But how insisting on using those terms might say about you.

I know he just went through a major medical issue. But immediately put his stamp on a scam. He, seemingly, got paid so those he influences could be grifted. How should the wrestling/MMA world react to this if true? Cuz based on the support from big names in MMA it doesn’t seem like he was hurting for money/support. But should he be given grace if he WAS struggling for money, post surgery?

Let’s bring this back to the top!

Should he and his team have known better than to promote a ‘Funky’ coin under those conditions? What should happen next if they had foreknowledge of the endgame?

Looks like Isaiah Martinez is no longer listed on the Illini website. No Job listing that I could find.

An easy way to help their VP to the nomination in '28. 1. Announce the pardoning of the J6 criminals. 2. Let your VP tell a reporter that those that attacked the police should not be pardoned. 3. Pardon the 'tresspassers' non violent offenders. 4. Let the VP tell another reporter that a conversation was had that the VP will resign if the J6 insurrectionists that attacked police will be pardoned. 5. Have a press conference to announce the J6 insurrectionists that were convicted of attacking police will NOT be pardoned because they back the blue are for law and order or whatever blather they need to say to give their base the dopamine they need. 6. Lame duck president sets the VP up to be strong and a force to be reconned with in '28. 7. Instead 47 made their VP look feckless and weak. The question that will end JD's political carrier will be, 'Why didn't you resign after learning the violent J6 insurrectionists were to be pardoned if you actually care about law and order and backing the blue?' The short answer will be, 'I want to be president some day.' Long answer, 'Going against 47 is a political death sentence. So I will lie cheat and fallat whomever I need to to get there. I will coddle any racist, homophobe, transphobe, and POS that can help me become president.' You all support the scummiest people. Which makes you scum yourself. Enjoy.

This seems appropriate to keep at the top of the queue for the next 47/5 months or so. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, that got all up in arms about the mayor doing something then undoing something but not really ever having done anything of significance, being raked over the proverbial coals for the fires in LA. Will stay eerily and loudly silent over the very real effect the president and their policies had on the crash in DC. Knowing that they are all full of $hhht they will cower in the shadows rather than stick their neck out for what is right and true. But will hope to continue to suckle at the dying teet of an orange skinned moron that could care less if they live or die. I know this because they sicked their horde or uneducated morons on the capitol building in a fit of rage for not being able to convince 60 some odd judges that they really won the election. Even tho we all, and they/them, know for a fact they lost the election. A liar that was finally going to be held accountable for their crimes was going to be sentences to potentially years in prison. Ran for president and said 'Yes' to anyone and everyone that they could say yes to. In the hopes of not going to prison for at least 4 years. Remember, the president is immune from prosecution. No one else is. Can't wait for a Reagan-esque prosecution of their staff and cabinet for all the crimes they are committing and will commit.

Stop me if this has already been said. But ID is needed to register. And not ID in the typical sense of a small plastic card. Sometimes in the form of a birth certificate coupled with a utility bill. These are required to tie you to an address. Which is located inside a district. That district determines which elections are on your particular ballot. If you are registered to vote. You have already done the hard part. Proved who you are and where you live. Confirming your address is in essence confirming who you are when you registered. Considering the risk vs reward of trying to fraudulently vote for someone else it is not likely that someone would try to do it. Hint, not many people have. Many have been caught. The numbers of which have not been high enough to be statistically significant enough to sway an election. This is what we call a 'Solution in search of a problem'. Everyone knows that forcing people to pay more, just for the opportunity to vote will disenfranchise some. And if the rationale for wanting voter ID laws for one reason is enough then surely it is for this reason too. If even one person is disenfranchised to vote, isn't that too many? Many of those people will be poor. Not able to afford to get ID(keeping in mind not everyone drives) or make multiple trips to scarcer and scarcer DMVs. Or the idea of having to wait in longer and longer voting lines, where conveniently enough republicans have enacted laws to no allow them to receive water(what are their reasons for that, btw? To protect your vote from undue influence, BS!) The confess their motives with their actions. Anyone that defends them is benefitting(or convinced they are benefitting, when they clearly aren't) from the tactics and cannot be trusted to honest. Long story short. People who, typically, want to pay less in taxes want others to pay more just to participate. All while making themselves believe its for the greater good when we all know it isn't and its been proven. So can we just drop this already?