Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Kind of makes you wonder why the indictment was so bad if it was "ready to go" . I kid. Of course you don't wonder. That would require critical thinking. Reposting a tweet where someone tells you what to think is so much easier. 

What do you believe was ‘bad’ about the indictment other than its soul of wit brevity?  Why disparage twitter?  It’s not a generator, it’s just a place.  The tweet from Katherine Herridge includes links to the full story as well as the documents that support the reporting.  John Solomon and Just the News does the same thing.  All you have to do is click on it and read it yourself.  There’s no “telling you what to think,” just old fashioned journalism, with evidence.  

Posted
49 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

What do you believe was ‘bad’ about the indictment other than its soul of wit brevity?  Why disparage twitter?  It’s not a generator, it’s just a place.  The tweet from Katherine Herridge includes links to the full story as well as the documents that support the reporting.  John Solomon and Just the News does the same thing.  All you have to do is click on it and read it yourself.  There’s no “telling you what to think,” just old fashioned journalism, with evidence.  

His anger And beliefs force him to hate musk 

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

What do you believe was ‘bad’ about the indictment other than its soul of wit brevity?  Why disparage twitter?  It’s not a generator, it’s just a place.  The tweet from Katherine Herridge includes links to the full story as well as the documents that support the reporting.  John Solomon and Just the News does the same thing.  All you have to do is click on it and read it yourself.  There’s no “telling you what to think,” just old fashioned journalism, with evidence.  

The brevity is a big part of it.

As I mentioned previously, the indictment does not contain a single statement from Comey that the DOJ claims to be a lie. They say he lied, but they do not identify the lie. The lone partial quote in the first charge they secured is from Ted Cruz, not James Comey. That is highly unusual and points at a faulty indictment.

In addition, upon presenting their case to the grand jury they only secured two of the three charges they sought. This is also highly unusual and indicative of a faulty indictment. As an aside, it was the first charge, usually the one you are most confident about/think is most serious, that got rejected.

Thirdly, they barely received enough votes from the grand jury to secure the two charges they did secure (14 out of 23). This is also unusual and indicative of a faulty indictment.

Someone you quoted suggested a full indictment had been prepared by the DOJ prior to the insurance lawyer arriving, yet the insurance lawyer only filed this faulty indictment.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
44 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

The brevity is a big part of it.

As I mentioned previously, the indictment does not contain a single statement from Comey that the DOJ claims to be a lie. They say he lied, but they do not identify the lie. The lone partial quote in the first charge they secured is from Ted Cruz, not James Comey. That is highly unusual and points at a faulty indictment.

In addition, upon presenting their case to the grand jury they only secured two of the three charges they sought. This is also highly unusual and indicative of a faulty indictment. As an aside, it was the first charge, usually the one you are most confident about/think is most serious, that got rejected.

Thirdly, they barely received enough votes from the grand jury to secure the two charges they did secure (14 out of 23). This is also unusual and indicative of a faulty indictment.

Someone you quoted suggested a full indictment had been prepared by the DOJ prior to the insurance lawyer arriving, yet the insurance lawyer only filed this faulty indictment.

So the grand jury got to see ALL the evidence and thought he should be indicted, but because you think you know what is in the indictment and you think know what was exactly presented to the grand jury you know better than them...got it... 🙄

Why not wait and see how this all plays out before talking in certainties when you know deep down you don't know what you think you know about this case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...