So was the Starocci thing a fluke...???

[Fletcher]

3 minutes ago, swoopdown said:

Since the Sandusky crimes, PSU admin has been hyper-reactive to allegations of athletic department related crimes.  They would throw anyone under the bus guilty or not to protect themselves.  For the Sandusky crimes, the three PSU administrators were legally culpable not because they believed or knew Sandusky to be a pedophile, but instead because they had a responsibility to refer a reported incident to police regardless of what they believed or didn't believe.  Negligence was proven not malice or conspiracy.  Would any PSU administrator risk negligence accusations again?  I'm guessing Carter allegations were thoroughly reported and investigated and evidence to convict did not exist.

So the answer for many PSU fans is once again, we don't know who's guilty, innocent or victim with certainty and never will.  Internet warriors will convict as they see fit.  Deja vu all over again.

The story broke over the summer, so it flew under the radar of mainstream media, and there's been no reporting since then. I don't think you can assume it's been thoroughly investigated.

And since Starocci's graduated, there's no reason to investigate now.

[ionel]

14 minutes ago, swoopdown said:

  I'm guessing Carter allegations were thoroughly reported and investigated and evidence to convict did not exist.

 

Then why hasn't there been a simple univ admin statement acknowledging such? 

[swoopdown]

Good question.  Waiting for the police or DA to take the initiative?  Anticipating a civil action?

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

Fluke?