She was holding what?

[Caveira]

from the news article linked in the tweet.    

A child who was playing on the monkey bars in the park saw Mart holding her penis and wiggling it at her, and she immediately told her friends and father.

 

[red viking]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

from the news article linked in the tweet.    

A child who was playing on the monkey bars in the park saw Mart holding her penis and wiggling it at her, and she immediately told her friends and father.

 

Nice try but 99.999% of the people doing this are still cis men. 

[Caveira]

35 minutes ago, red viking said:

Nice try but 99.999% of the people doing this are still cis men. 

That’s a made up term for low T people.  
 

The reason for the post wasn’t that men do horrible things.  That they do from time to time.  It’s that the press had to write a woman showed her dik.   Which isn’t correct…. And is a bunch of nonsense.  

[red viking]

25 minutes ago, Caveira said:

That’s a made up term for low T people.  
 

The reason for the post wasn’t that men do horrible things.  That they do from time to time.  It’s that the press had to write a woman showed her dik.   Which isn’t correct…. And is a bunch of nonsense.  

Lol. 

Projecting your own t-related insecurities, like wingers often do. 

The article makes it clear she was transgender so this is pure semantics. Everybody knows what happened. Go cry about terminologies to your fellow insecure wingers. Real men don't really care what people want to call themselves because they aren't threatened by it. 

All that matters is that she (or he, whatever) exposed herself. 

Edited 3 hours ago by red viking

[mspart]

What woman has a penis?   The definition of a woman is one without a penis.  The fact that this woman had a penis means this woman was not a woman, but is a man.   Period. 

mspart

[red viking]

26 minutes ago, mspart said:

What woman has a penis?   The definition of a woman is one without a penis.  The fact that this woman had a penis means this woman was not a woman, but is a man.   Period. 

mspart

110% bs. It's way way way more important that a person exposed their genitalia than whether you call her a man or trans woman. Absolutely disgusting that u think the terminology is more important than the crime itself. Sick of wingers gaslighting sex crimes. Exposing a penis to a kid for gratification is absolutely disgusting. 

The right is 110% morally bankrupt and sexually depraved. 

Edited 20 minutes ago by red viking

[mspart]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

110% bs. It's way way way more important that a person exposed their genitalia than whether you call her a man or trans woman. Absolutely disgusting that u think the terminology is more important than the crime itself. Sick of wingers gaslighting sex crimes. Exposing a penis to a kid for gratification is absolutely disgusting. 

It is disgusting that the news would propagate falsehoods like this so brazenly.   

She wagged her penis in front of the kids.       There is a dissonance to this that is crazy.   Your last sentence is correct. 

How is it gaslighting sex crimes by saying it wasn't a woman waving her penis in front of kids when a woman doesn't have one?   A man has one.   It is like saying a male lion nursed a lion cub.   Everyone knows a male lion cannot nurse.   Everone knows that a woman does not have a penis.   The article is factually wrong in this regard.   Pretending otherwise is the gaslighting.  

mspart

[red viking]

Just now, mspart said:

It is disgusting that the news would propagate falsehoods like this so brazenly.   

She wagged her penis in front of the kids.       There is a dissonance to this that is crazy.   Your last sentence is correct. 

How is it gaslighting sex crimes by saying it wasn't a woman waving her penis in front of kids when a woman doesn't have one?   A man has one.   It is like saying a male lion nursed a lion cub.   Everyone knows a male lion cannot nurse.   Everone knows that a woman does not have a penis.   The article is factually wrong in this regard.   Pretending otherwise is the gaslighting.  

mspart

A person exposed themselves to a kid, a sex crime, and all you want to talk about is what whether we call it a man or trans woman. You dont seem to care one squirt about the crime itself. Morally bankrupt. 

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, mspart said:

It is disgusting that the news would propagate falsehoods like this so brazenly.   

She wagged her penis in front of the kids.       There is a dissonance to this that is crazy.   Your last sentence is correct. 

How is it gaslighting sex crimes by saying it wasn't a woman waving her penis in front of kids when a woman doesn't have one?   A man has one.   It is like saying a male lion nursed a lion cub.   Everyone knows a male lion cannot nurse.   Everone knows that a woman does not have a penis.   The article is factually wrong in this regard.   Pretending otherwise is the gaslighting.  

mspart

Also, everybody knows thar biological females don't have penises. Therefore the terminology here is 110% irrelevant compared to the true travesty here. 

[mspart]

8 minutes ago, red viking said:

Also, everybody knows thar biological females don't have penises. Therefore the terminology here is 110% irrelevant compared to the true travesty here. 

What?   The sex act is one thing.   Reporting it falsely is another thing.   Talk about gaslighting.   Language matters and truth matters.   A woman did not shake her willy at kids as it has been reported.   That is false. 

Not diminishing the gravity of the crime, but the reporting of it is trying to make it something it was not.   

mspart