Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, red viking said:

Wingers couldn't be more hypocritical. Few if any of us have only copulated for solely reproductive purposes. Removal of the fetus is independent of killing the fetus. It just so happens that the fetus can't survive before a certain time but that doesn't change the fact that the woman has the right to remove it. 

There are zero other situations where somebody is forced to provide life support to somebody else. It's clearly wrong and violates the natural laws of God. The logical and correct decision here is to be consistent and allow pregnant women to also have this right. 

It's all very logical and obvious to anybody with half a brain and that has read the various documents written by the Founding Fathers. Roe v. Wade makes that clear. That decision was made back in the day before we had activist political hack judges running our country.

I’m not arguing the right to abortion so much as making point of your stupid arguments for it, like dying on the hill of “forced to provide life support for someone else”.  Thats just a dumb statement you keep repeating over and over again.  But then again, since you’re on the vibe of what god did and did create….he also created the ability to be dumb, so… 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted
3 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It wasn't missed, it was just floating in a sea of what amounts to "I know you are but what am I", and then continued by the other half of the angry little fella(I know its summer school time, but you should still remember that an 's' on the end indicates plurality).   

But you're still so damn adorable!!

And there’s Mr feel’’’’’S responding to something he says he avoids and doesn’t interact with.  
 

AGAIN 

Posted
3 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It wasn't missed, it was just floating in a sea of what amounts to "I know you are but what am I", and then continued by the other half of the angry little fella(I know its summer school time, but you should still remember that an 's' on the end indicates plurality).   

But you're still so damn adorable!!

My comment was a get back on track comment before yours was.  I just didn’t have to announce mine while patting myself on the back like you did.  
 

Yep. ADORABLE.  but sorry I’m taken.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, 152lbs said:

Some of you are a little too cool with concentration camps.

Some of us know the definition of concentration camps. 

Posted
3 hours ago, 152lbs said:

Some of you are a little too cool with concentration camps.

Look who’s back at the airport. Announced you were leaving yet took a return flight.  Bahahahahahahahhaa

Posted
9 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

And there’s Mr feel’’’’’S responding to something he says he avoids and doesn’t interact with.  
 

AGAIN 

Adorable, angry, and obviously confused. 

Posted
6 hours ago, 152lbs said:

In every sense.  It may not be extermination camp but it very much is a concentration camp.

The measure will be whether or not innocent people end up there.  If people end up there for no other reason than they are foreign, then you might be onto something.  If it’s strictly the illegals (they’re saying just the violent illegals but we’ll see about that), then it’s simply a detention center while they await their hearing. Supposedly there is going to be judge, maybe judges, on site to get to these hearings efficiently.  That, too, will be interesting to see if comes to fruition. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...