scourge165 Posted June 5 Posted June 5 33 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: Post it again, please. Post the raw data with crosstabs. He's grossly misrepresenting the data. That's why he's not going to show you. There have been more employers who are dropping a 4 year degree as a requirement in favor of experience and because they're simply trying to find employees. A College degree is still incredibly valuable on average when looking at long term earning potential as a whole(this is likely where he'd compare a skilled welder with someone who went to get a...Philosophy degree as "proof" that's not true, but on balance, it is). I'm not even sure what his point is though. Does he think people who DIDN'T go to College are MORE ready or...what? He also went to College twice. Seems like there was a reason for that(meaning... he did it for his career/earning potential, not attacking his intellect, though if you think Hitler is far left, that surely raises the question). Quote The claim that only 4% of employers believe college graduates are ready for the workplace is not supported by current data. While there is concern among employers regarding the preparedness of recent graduates, the actual figures are higher. Employer Perceptions of Graduate Readiness 40% of business leaders believe recent college graduates are either "somewhat unprepared" (27%) or "very unprepared" (13%) for the workforce. Conversely, 53% consider them at least "somewhat prepared," and 20% view them as "very prepared" . A 2025 Forage survey revealed that 41% of employers think recent graduates are truly ready for the workplace, while 72% of students feel prepared, highlighting a significant perception gap . Factors Contributing to Perceived Unpreparedness Employers have identified several areas where recent graduates may lack readiness: Work ethic and communication skills: Each cited by 70% of employers as areas of concern . Sense of entitlement: Noted by 51% of employers. Technological skills: Highlighted by 43% as insufficient. Professionalism and workplace etiquette: Including challenges with receiving feedback, punctuality, and appropriate workplace behavior . Efforts to Bridge the Gap In response to these concerns, some employers are implementing measures to better prepare graduates for the workforce: Soft skills training: Companies are offering programs to enhance communication, teamwork, and adaptability. Mentorship initiatives: Pairing new hires with experienced employees to facilitate smoother transitions. Enhanced onboarding processes: Providing comprehensive introductions to company culture and expectations. 1
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, scourge165 said: He's grossly misrepresenting the data. That's why he's not going to show you. There have been more employers who are dropping a 4 year degree as a requirement in favor of experience and because they're simply trying to find employees. A College degree is still incredibly valuable on average when looking at long term earning potential as a whole(this is likely where he'd compare a skilled welder with someone who went to get a...Philosophy degree as "proof" that's not true, but on balance, it is). I'm not even sure what his point is though. Does he think people who DIDN'T go to College are MORE ready or...what? He also went to College twice. Seems like there was a reason for that(meaning... he did it for his career/earning potential, not attacking his intellect, though if you think Hitler is far left, that surely raises the question). You and I both know this. Everyone watching can see this. I just want to see if El Luchador can dethrone BigBrog as 'person most likely to need external technical assistance to exchange gasses'. 1
Caveira Posted June 5 Posted June 5 4 minutes ago, scourge165 said: He's grossly misrepresenting the data. That's why he's not going to show you. There have been more employers who are dropping a 4 year degree as a requirement in favor of experience and because they're simply trying to find employees. A College degree is still incredibly valuable on average when looking at long term earning potential as a whole(this is likely where he'd compare a skilled welder with someone who went to get a...Philosophy degree as "proof" that's not true, but on balance, it is). I'm not even sure what his point is though. Does he think people who DIDN'T go to College are MORE ready or...what? He also went to College twice. Seems like there was a reason for that(meaning... he did it for his career/earning potential, not attacking his intellect, though if you think Hitler is far left, that surely raises the question). Is cnn left or right leaning? For the first time since record-keeping on the topic began in 1980, the unemployment rate for recent graduates (those 22 to 27 years old with a bachelor’s degree or higher) is consistently higher than the national unemployment rate, according to Oxford Economics. summary: Perceived Skill Gaps: Some employers have expressed concerns about the readiness of recent graduates to meet workplace demands. A survey cited by the New York Post revealed that a significant percentage of business leaders found Gen Z employees lacking in areas such as motivation, communication skills, and professionalism. This perception has made companies hesitant to invest in hiring and training new graduates. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/06/02/business/jobs-market-college-graduate-economy 1 1
El Luchador Posted June 5 Author Posted June 5 1 hour ago, scourge165 said: I like how the entire basis for your argument Hitler isn't the epitome of a right wing extremists is just...'nuh-uh.' You can keep talking about my "leftist" professors all you'd like, he wasn't. It's a fact, he banned the socialist parties, he hated communists, I've given you numerous reasons and you are just not capable of understanding it. And that's fine. Hitler was a Nationalist, Ethnocentric, Authoritarian. You act like I'm calling you that(though...you have called me a Communist despite the fact that I've never uttered a positive word about communists, Mao or the like) but you can't accept Hitler was on the opposite end of the spectrum as Stalin and Mao. Cool. Neither represent ANYTHING we've EVER had as a form of leadership in the United States, but this is still an important point for you for...some reason I guess. You're wrong, but you're confidently wrong...so that's something I suppose. So you're saying the Socialist banned the Socialist party? This is your example of superior intelligence? 2
El Luchador Posted June 5 Author Posted June 5 9 minutes ago, scourge165 said: He's grossly misrepresenting the data. That's why he's not going to show you. There have been more employers who are dropping a 4 year degree as a requirement in favor of experience and because they're simply trying to find employees. A College degree is still incredibly valuable on average when looking at long term earning potential as a whole(this is likely where he'd compare a skilled welder with someone who went to get a...Philosophy degree as "proof" that's not true, but on balance, it is). I'm not even sure what his point is though. Does he think people who DIDN'T go to College are MORE ready or...what? He also went to College twice. Seems like there was a reason for that(meaning... he did it for his career/earning potential, not attacking his intellect, though if you think Hitler is far left, that surely raises the question). Your taking one aspect of Employability and over representing it as the only consideration. Not very intellectually honest. 1 1
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, El Luchador said: Your taking one aspect of Employability and over representing it as the only consideration. Not very intellectually honest. How do you manage to type this being so clearly hypoxic?
Caveira Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: How do you manage to type this being so clearly hypoxic? Take a look at that cnn data above.
JimmySpeaks Posted June 5 Posted June 5 11 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: You and I both know this. Everyone watching can see this. I just want to see if El Luchador can dethrone BigBrog as 'person most likely to need external technical assistance to exchange gasses'. Says the guy that can’t post a screen shot of a picture so it’s legible.
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted June 5 Posted June 5 Just now, Caveira said: Take a look at that cnn data above. We're 6 pages deep. Post a clean link.
Caveira Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: We're 6 pages deep. Post a clean link. It’s a link from cnn from June second 2025. It’s pretty new so you may not have read it in your extensive travels. For the first time since record-keeping on the topic began in 1980, the unemployment rate for recent graduates (those 22 to 27 years old with a bachelor’s degree or higher) is consistently higher than the national unemployment rate, according to Oxford Economics. summary: Perceived Skill Gaps: Some employers have expressed concerns about the readiness of recent graduates to meet workplace demands. A survey cited by the New York Post revealed that a significant percentage of business leaders found Gen Z employees lacking in areas such as motivation, communication skills, and professionalism. This perception has made companies hesitant to invest in hiring and training new graduates. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/06/02/business/jobs-market-college-graduate-economy
El Luchador Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 (edited) Ironically I had a conversation with a very respected College coach, he shared with me that the school was receiving feedback from employers that they are now pursuing math majors for non math based positions because they are trained thinkers and are able to quantify and analyze information. They are literally willing to bypass the main skill set they wish to have knowing that a math degree is much less likely to have been subjected to ideological manipulation. Or simply put today's college graduates don't offer businesses appealing candidates. Edited June 6 by El Luchador
El Luchador Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 7 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: How do you manage to type this being so clearly hypoxic? You literally prove my point every time you post. Your generation is blind to reality and downright undesirable to have around. 1 1
JimmySpeaks Posted June 6 Posted June 6 11 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: We're 6 pages deep. Post a clean link. You sure love talking about going deep.
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted June 6 Posted June 6 6 minutes ago, El Luchador said: You literally prove my point every time you post. Your generation is blind to reality and downright undesirable to have around. I'm your generation, child.
Caveira Posted June 6 Posted June 6 Just now, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: I'm your generation, child. You’re ignoring the cnn data boss. 1
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted June 6 Posted June 6 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Caveira said: It’s a link from cnn from June second 2025. It’s pretty new so you may not have read it in your extensive travels. For the first time since record-keeping on the topic began in 1980, the unemployment rate for recent graduates (those 22 to 27 years old with a bachelor’s degree or higher) is consistently higher than the national unemployment rate, according to Oxford Economics. summary: Perceived Skill Gaps: Some employers have expressed concerns about the readiness of recent graduates to meet workplace demands. A survey cited by the New York Post revealed that a significant percentage of business leaders found Gen Z employees lacking in areas such as motivation, communication skills, and professionalism. This perception has made companies hesitant to invest in hiring and training new graduates. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/06/02/business/jobs-market-college-graduate-economy This guy? lol, fcuk all the way off. Edited June 6 by Saylors_Tiny_Willie
Caveira Posted June 6 Posted June 6 4 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: This guy? lol, fcuk all the way off. He cites studies. I’ve posted 10 others. You’re a lost cause. 1
scourge165 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 29 minutes ago, El Luchador said: So you're saying the Socialist banned the Socialist party? This is your example of superior intelligence? Yes, I am...and thank you for again confirming that was as shallow as your thought process on Hitler's policies went! It's... honestly amusing when I've explained the origin of the "NAZI" title several times. Also, how do you not just KNOW this? You took TWO runs through College. Jesus...YES, Hitler was vehemently opposed to Socialism... I don't know what your argument is OTHER than there's NO examples of extreme right wing ideologies that are bad...and you're so ignorant, you can't wrap your head around Hitler being one of them. Quote Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime actively suppressed and banned socialist movements and parties in Germany after coming to power in 1933. Suppression of Socialist Parties Despite the "National Socialist" label in the Nazi Party's name, Hitler's regime was fundamentally opposed to socialism. In June 1933, the Nazis banned the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), which had been the largest left-wing party during the Weimar Republic. Many of its leaders were arrested and sent to concentration camps .theholocaustexplained.orgspartacus-educational.com Shortly thereafter, on July 14, 1933, the Nazi government enacted the "Law Against the Formation of Parties," which declared the Nazi Party as the only legal political party in Germany. This law effectively outlawed all other political parties, including socialist and communist organizations .en.wikipedia.org+1germanhistorydocs.org+1 Economic and Political Policies The Nazi regime's policies were not aligned with socialist principles. While the Nazis used anti-capitalist rhetoric to gain support, their actions favored large industrialists and suppressed labor movements. Independent trade unions were abolished, and workers were forced into the state-controlled German Labor Front. The economy was geared toward rearmament and war preparation, with significant collaboration between the state and major corporations .explaininghistory.orgen.wikipedia.org In summary, although the Nazi Party's name included the term "Socialist," Hitler's regime actively dismantled socialist institutions and persecuted their members, establishing a totalitarian state that opposed socialist
El Luchador Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 21 minutes ago, scourge165 said: Yes, I am...and thank you for again confirming that was as shallow as your thought process on Hitler's policies went! It's... honestly amusing when I've explained the origin of the "NAZI" title several times. Also, how do you not just KNOW this? You took TWO runs through College. Jesus...YES, Hitler was vehemently opposed to Socialism... I don't know what your argument is OTHER than there's NO examples of extreme right wing ideologies that are bad...and you're so ignorant, you can't wrap your head around Hitler being one of them. He wasn't a globalist nimrod he was a national socialist. He banned all political parties because he was a leftist authoritarian dictator. Now you know the actual truth. 2
El Luchador Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 https://wallbuilders.com/resource/the-nazis-really-were-socialists/ 2
El Luchador Posted June 6 Author Posted June 6 Who were the Nazis: They believed in eugenics Forced sterilization Gun control Racial superiority which was at the heart of Margaret Stanger's motivation. He implement censorship which we saw under democrats in the previous administration. At the very time the American left was legislating segregation Hitler was removing races he didn't want interacting with his superior race The American left at the time was making arguments to Euthanized undesirable, sick and imbecilic persons. Hitler used brown shirts to create turmoil and desperation much like Antifa and BLM. The American left and the Nazi philosophy were in lock step then and today. 2
JimmySpeaks Posted June 6 Posted June 6 14 minutes ago, El Luchador said: Who were the Nazis: They believed in eugenics Forced sterilization Gun control Racial superiority which was at the heart of Margaret Stanger's motivation. He implement censorship which we saw under democrats in the previous administration. At the very time the American left was legislating segregation Hitler was removing races he didn't want interacting with his superior race The American left at the time was making arguments to Euthanized undesirable, sick and imbecilic persons. Hitler used brown shirts to create turmoil and desperation much like Antifa and BLM. The American left and the Nazi philosophy were in lock step then and today. You forgot the Nazis ran a “joy” campaign just like the Dems just did. I’m guessing thats where Dems got it from 1
scourge165 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 1 hour ago, El Luchador said: He wasn't a globalist nimrod he was a national socialist. He banned all political parties because he was a leftist authoritarian dictator. Now you know the actual truth. LOL...dude, what are you talking about? NOBODY said he was a globalist. He was an Ethnocentric Nationalist! That...IS about as Right Wing as you can get. He also took STATE owned industries like Steel, Mining, Banking and PRIVITIZED them in an attempt to garner support from industrialists and stimulate economic growth. It was PRIVATE INDUSTRY that propelled the Nazi Party to prominence starting in 1932. He banned labor unions, he threw socialists(and communists) in Prison! That you keep arguing he was a "Socialist" in the face of ALL the evidence at this point means you KNOW you're wrong, you can't admit you're wrong, but you're going to double down and keep arguing because you don't understand where and why they were named the NAZI party and as long as you can repeat that one line...again, despite ALL historical and empirical data, you can just keep cutting and pasting that same reply! I'm honestly getting embarrassed for you. Quote The term "National Socialist" in the Nazi Party's name was primarily a strategic choice rather than a reflection of socialist ideology. The full name, Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), was adopted in 1920 to broaden the party's appeal during the tumultuous years of the Weimar Republic.thesecondworldwar.orglive.fullfact.org+5britannica.com+5facinghistory.org+5 Err...but...he wasn't a Globalist and... and it says NAZI, so he was a leftist! He is the definition of "FAR RIGHT," and I really can't believe this is even being debated... It really says a lot about you that you not only don't already know this, but that you're so insecure about Hitler's politics being far "right," that you have to argue this hard. It says even more that you have to call me a Communist to begin with or assign the beliefs of Mao or Lenin to me. It's an intellectually lazy argument people who aren't capable of independent thought fall back on(sorta like calling everyone they don't like a NAZI)... but I'm pretty sure yo KNOW you're wrong here, you're just not willing to admit as much.
scourge165 Posted June 6 Posted June 6 46 minutes ago, El Luchador said: At the very time the American left was legislating segregation Hitler was removing races he didn't want interacting with his superior race This VERY sentence tells me you don't understand "Left" and "right" to begin with. It was America's CONSERVATIVE wing that was legislating segregation. You don't even know what conservative or progressive means! The PROGRESSIVES were against segregation.
JimmySpeaks Posted June 6 Posted June 6 2 minutes ago, scourge165 said: This VERY sentence tells me you don't understand "Left" and "right" to begin with. It was America's CONSERVATIVE wing that was legislating segregation. You don't even know what conservative or progressive means! The PROGRESSIVES were against segregation. Kkk = democrats ummmmm kinda is all about segregation
Tyler Fromm Trinty-Pawling, New York Class of 2025 Committed to Franklin & Marshall Projected Weight: 165
Sloane Kruger Black Hills, Washington Class of 2025 Committed to Presbyterian (Women) Projected Weight: 110
Elliza Brunner Copper Hills, Utah Class of 2025 Committed to Providence (Women) Projected Weight: 117, 124
Paula Sanchez Valley, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Waynesburg (Women) Projected Weight: 124
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now