ACC Thread

[1032004]

Singleton over Wolak (again).  Will Wolak even qualify after AA’ing last year?

[D3 for LU]

D3

[D3 for LU]

D3

[D3 for LU]

Here's some results... 133 SF find 4th Kai Orine NC St winning over the 1st seed Ethan Oakley NCar 6-2 and he'll be going up against #2 seed Connor McGonagle of Va.Tech who dec. #3 seed Tyler Knox of Stanford 1-0.

D3

Edited 12 hours ago by D3 for LU

[1032004]

Latona over Scott 1-0

[D3 for LU]

125 has #1 seed Eddie Ventresca in the finals as he won over #4 seed Nick Babin of Pitt 19-5

Also in the 125 finals will be #2 seed Vin Robinson of NC St w/ his win over #3 seed Spender Moore of NCar.

D3

[D3 for LU]

Please continue, 1032004!

D3

[1032004]

McNeil over Abas 4-1 in SV

[1032004]

Hipolito vs Cholokyan on Mat 1 now, could be fireworks 

[D3 for LU]

6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Hipolito vs Cholokyan on Mat 1 now, could be fireworks 

I'm a fan of Stanford's Cholokyan... his style IS explosive.

(Unfortunately he's behind 10-3 in the 3rd...)

D3 

Edited 12 hours ago by D3 for LU

[Gantry]

It's going to take me at least a decade to update my brain to Stanford being in the ACC. 

[1032004]

Pitzer over Trumble 4-1

[gromit]

Trent hoagie Hidlay doing a good job filling in for Rock on the mic with Sean Kenny.

[1032004]

Started at 157, Hipolito over Scott

[MidniteToka]

6 hours ago, D3 for LU said:

125 has #1 seed Eddie Ventresca in the finals as he won over #4 seed Nick Babin of Pitt 19-5

Also in the 125 finals will be #2 seed Vin Robinson of NC St w/ his win over #3 seed Spender Moore of NCar.

D3

Ventresca looks old enough to be Alex Marinelli's dad.

[Pinnacle]

That was a td for Ventresca imo. Glad they changed it.

Edited 5 hours ago by Pinnacle

[1032004]

34 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

That was a td for Ventresca imo. Glad they changed it.

Agree.  Is this same as B10 where when they review it on their own it’s the mat refs and when they actually challenge it’s a third party?

[Pinnacle]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Agree.  Is this same as B10 where when they review it on their own it’s the mat refs and when they actually challenge it’s a third party?

Not sure, but it was reviewed twice.

[1032004]

11 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

Not sure, but it was reviewed twice.

Pretty sure it was, in Orine/McGonagle they confirmed it is not the mat refs reviewing the challenges.  Looked like it may have been Gary Kessell.  But yeah, don’t think I’ve ever seen that before - call is made, officials overturn it on their own then challenged and reversed back to original call…