Florida Rep Cory Mills under investigation by DOJ

[1032004]

That I’m aware of, he’s been accused of:

-sexual misconduct

-domestic abuse

-blackmail

-campaign finance violations

-lying about his military record

-punching someone then running away at a college football game in 2023

 

Will Republican voters show some morals, or will this guy win his primary (and general election)?

@Bigbrog: safe to say he’s a POS?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-cory-mills-active-criminal-investigation-department-justice

https://apnews.com/article/cory-mills-censure-ethics-committee-nancy-macy-787891b9b1968701d684015b8ab256aa#

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/02/takeaways-cory-mills-investigation-florida/

[Simpleman424]

17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

That I’m aware of, he’s been accused of:

-sexual misconduct

-domestic abuse

-blackmail

-campaign finance violations

-lying about his military record

-punching someone then running away at a college football game in 2023

 

Will Republican voters show some morals, or will this guy win his primary (and general election)?

@Bigbrog: safe to say he’s a POS?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-cory-mills-active-criminal-investigation-department-justice

https://apnews.com/article/cory-mills-censure-ethics-committee-nancy-macy-787891b9b1968701d684015b8ab256aa#

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/02/takeaways-cory-mills-investigation-florida/

Accused of…key word in a country where you’re innocent until proven guilty. I am also a firm believer that if you’re accused of that much you’re likely guilty of at least some of it at a minimum…so take that for what it’s worth. It’s Florida man…that place be crazy. I wouldn’t take much from the turn out on this one and certainly wouldn’t apply it to republicans as a whole…

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Simpleman424 said:

Accused of…key word in a country where you’re innocent until proven guilty. I am also a firm believer that if you’re accused of that much you’re likely guilty of at least some of it at a minimum…so take that for what it’s worth. It’s Florida man…that place be crazy. I wouldn’t take much from the turn out on this one and certainly wouldn’t apply it to republicans as a whole…

I’m not saying he needs to be in jail.  But that’s a pretty long list of a lot of different stuff, he certainly wouldn’t want to be someone I’d want to vote for.    And Republicans (not necessarily you) certainly seem to be more willing to trot out the “they’re just accusations!” line when it’s one of their own, as opposed to when the accusations are against a Dem.  @Caveira used that line as well in the Max Miller thread.

[Simpleman424]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

I’m not saying he needs to be in jail.  But that’s a pretty long list of a lot of different stuff, he certainly wouldn’t want to be someone I’d want to vote for.    And Republicans (not necessarily you) certainly seem to be more willing to trot out the “they’re just accusations!” line when it’s one of their own, as opposed to when the accusations are against a Dem.  @Caveira used that line as well in the Max Miller thread.

Yea I’m willing to say he should be in jail for at least a couple of those…if guilty (likely is). Really annoying that a lot of these things only come up when people are going for office etc.

[Bigbrog]

2 hours ago, 1032004 said:

That I’m aware of, he’s been accused of:

-sexual misconduct

-domestic abuse

-blackmail

-campaign finance violations

-lying about his military record

-punching someone then running away at a college football game in 2023

 

Will Republican voters show some morals, or will this guy win his primary (and general election)?

@Bigbrog: safe to say he’s a POS?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-cory-mills-active-criminal-investigation-department-justice

https://apnews.com/article/cory-mills-censure-ethics-committee-nancy-macy-787891b9b1968701d684015b8ab256aa#

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/02/takeaways-cory-mills-investigation-florida/

Man you are an obsessed whackadoodle

[1032004]

17 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Man you are an obsessed whackadoodle

All the evidence has been provided to you.  By refusing to acknowledge that they are POS’s, you are defending them because of their political party.

Edited July 27 by 1032004

[Bigbrog]

12 hours ago, 1032004 said:

All the evidence has been provided to you.  By refusing to acknowledge that they are POS’s, you are defending them because of their political party.

And you then double down on your whackadoodleness 

[1032004]

13 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

And you then double down on your whackadoodleness 

All you have to do is acknowledge they are POS’s.  Heck, let’s start with at least one of Mills, Miller, Paxton.  You can do it, I believe in you.

[Bigbrog]

Just now, 1032004 said:

All you have to do is acknowledge they are POS’s.  Heck, let’s start with at least one of Mills, Miller, Paxton.  You can do it, I believe in you.

Read what I wrote multiple times... what is your deal!?  

You are obsessing over trying to prove that you didn't defend a POS just because he is D by claiming I have done the same thing for a R candidate yet you can't point to one time I have done so nor done anything remotely close to supporting someone just because of their political affiliation.  You then start posting random links from God knows what type of websites claiming people have been accused of doing horrible things and then jumping up and down screaming "Call them a POS! Call them a POS!"... even after I post multiple times what my opinion is on those situations of which I know very little about...and which I definitely did not defend them...quite the opposite. 

But carry on being your whackadoodle self just like RV and GWN.

[1032004]

22 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Read what I wrote multiple times... what is your deal!?  

You are obsessing over trying to prove that you didn't defend a POS just because he is D by claiming I have done the same thing for a R candidate yet you can't point to one time I have done so nor done anything remotely close to supporting someone just because of their political affiliation.  You then start posting random links from God knows what type of websites claiming people have been accused of doing horrible things and then jumping up and down screaming "Call them a POS! Call them a POS!"... even after I post multiple times what my opinion is on those situations of which I know very little about...and which I definitely did not defend them...quite the opposite. 

But carry on being your whackadoodle self just like RV and GWN.

What do you mean “quite the opposite”?   Have you called out any of these guys with anything other than an “…if this is true” statement?

Good to know Fox News is a “god knows  what type of website” though 

[1032004]

Even if guys like @Bigbrog and @Caveira want to argue technicalities like “I didn’t defend these guys!” it’s been proven they are much quicker to criticize a Dem accused of lesser things, with less evidence.   Sorry facts upset you guys.

Edited July 27 by 1032004

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Even if guys like @Bigbrog and @Caveira want to argue technicalities like “I didn’t defend these guys!” it’s been proven they are much quicker to criticize a Dem accused of lesser things, with less evidence.   Sorry facts upset you guys.

The level of your cra cra ocd is off the chart boss 

[1032004]

@WrestlingRasta, thoughts on Mills?  Think he’s going to win?  He is in your state.

[WrestlingRasta]

2 hours ago, 1032004 said:

@WrestlingRasta, thoughts on Mills?  Think he’s going to win?  He is in your state.

I honestly don’t know much about him, or that race. I’m pretty sure I’ve read more about Mills from you on here than anywhere else. 
 

When it comes to elections and campaigns, as far as prioritizing my attention and studying, I start local and go from there.  The more localized the government, the more direct impact it has on our day to day life. And in that regard the other congressional districts have very very little impact on my life, and I have absolutely zero impact on who is elected in those. 

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I honestly don’t know much about him, or that race. I’m pretty sure I’ve read more about Mills from you on here than anywhere else. 
 

When it comes to elections and campaigns, as far as prioritizing my attention and studying, I start local and go from there.  The more localized the government, the more direct impact it has on our day to day life. And in that regard the other congressional districts have very very little impact on my life, and I have absolutely zero impact on who is elected in those. 

You didn’t read the script.   He wanted you to get in the boat and super denounce them and everyone else on here.  Tisk tisk 

[Bigbrog]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Even if guys like @Bigbrog and @Caveira want to argue technicalities like “I didn’t defend these guys!” it’s been proven they are much quicker to criticize a Dem accused of lesser things, with less evidence.   Sorry facts upset you guys.

AGAIN...prove your claim!!

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

AGAIN...prove your claim!!

Exactly, speaking of proving claims, there is less evidence to prove the claims against Platner than there is against all 3 of the other guys I listed. Yet you definitively called Platner a POS and refuse to do the same for the others.

[Bigbrog]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Exactly, speaking of proving claims, there is less evidence to prove the claims against Platner than there is against all 3 of the other guys I listed. Yet you definitively called Platner a POS and refuse to do the same for the others.

Lol... you are something else... AGAIN...prove that I have given a pass, or defended someone just because of their political affiliation...you can't because I haven't. But you have...end of story. 

[1032004]

11 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Lol... you are something else... AGAIN...prove that I have given a pass, or defended someone just because of their political affiliation...you can't because I haven't. But you have...end of story. 

You called Platner a POS.

I provided evidence that Mills, Miller and Paxton are also POS’s.

You refuse to call them a POS.

If you want to hang on to “I’m not defending them!” I am pointing out the proven fact that you will call a Dem a POS based on less evidence compared to a Republican. Since there is far more evidence of those three being POS’s than Platner.

[WrestlingRasta]

5 hours ago, Caveira said:

You didn’t read the script.   He wanted you to get in the boat and super denounce them and everyone else on here.  Tisk tisk 

I guess that’s the consequences when you think for yourself and form your own opinions, instead of following the ‘script’. 
 

Offer still stands…

[Caveira]

16 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I guess that’s the consequences when you think for yourself and form your own opinions, instead of following the ‘script’. 
 

Offer still stands…

I was just letting you know his intentions.  As your spiritual advisor I thought it would be helpful 

[Bigbrog]

17 hours ago, 1032004 said:

You called Platner a POS.

I provided evidence that Mills, Miller and Paxton are also POS’s.

You refuse to call them a POS.

If you want to hang on to “I’m not defending them!” I am pointing out the proven fact that you will call a Dem a POS based on less evidence compared to a Republican. Since there is far more evidence of those three being POS’s than Platner.

 If nothing else you are a good laugh.

Your use of not very good mental gymnastics to try and make some weird connection is only offset by yet another example of defending a POS by claiming his POS'ness is less than others POS'ness just because of their political affiliation... seriously can't make this stuff up.

I look forward to your next ridiculous post and the good belly laugh it will provide. 

[1032004]

Just now, Bigbrog said:

 If nothing else you are a good laugh.

Your use of not very good mental gymnastics to try and make some weird connection is only offset by yet another example of defending a POS by claiming his POS'ness is less than others POS'ness just because of their political affiliation... seriously can't make this stuff up.

I look forward to your next ridiculous post and the good belly laugh it will provide. 

Platner may be slightly more of a POS than the others, if the latest allegation against him is true.  But there’s more actual evidence of the numerous allegations against the other three being true, making them also POS’s.

[WrestlingRasta]

13 hours ago, Caveira said:

I was just letting you know his intentions.  As your spiritual advisor I thought it would be helpful 

Ummm, okay.   Offer still stands.  Let me know when you want to have a straight forward conversation on issues. 

[Bigbrog]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Platner may be slightly more of a POS than the others, if the latest allegation against him is true.  But there’s more actual evidence of the numerous allegations against the other three being true, making them also POS’s.