All Activity

Worth pointing out that for top teams you'll probably see their 2nd and maybe 3rd wrestler at weight during the event.

The red-bellied sap sucker looked to be exercising more than her Constitutionally enumerated powers.

What if it were a republican congressman during the last admin?

So I think I actually saw this one. Does he have to beat the evil rich kid in the end?

Unless there is a last minute entry, he is going to run away with it

Gotcha

I completely overlooked Robinson (don't know how). For some reason, Ryan Jack is not in Flo's list. Either they know something we don't or he was omitted unintentionally.

i know you personally havent given him any sort of pass. but there are A LOT that are. all men. we forget children are picked up and raised to be addicts and forced into this sometimes. i just cannot assume that every one of his transactions were kosher.

That is fun. Took me a few to get the hang of it (guess I should have read the instructions first). I want more! haha

This is great work! Think you left Robinson off of 125 and Ryan Jack off 141 though.

It looks that way, doesn't it? If you or I pulled that crap, we wouldn't be on this forum right now.

It looks like all drawn teams have accepted with the exception of Arizona State. I know this isn't an individual tournament and we have no idea what matchups we'll see, but based on Flo's "2025-2026 NCAA Wrestling Championship Prediction Rankings" article, I've put together the "ranked" wrestlers and teams in attendance. In blue are teams that either haven't accepted (ASU) or are alternates (SDSU & WVU). Could be some pretty good early season match's depending on how the team brackets fall. Would have liked to see Iowa State involved, and of course Penn State, but...oh well.

Interesting metaphor. I'd say the woman (what she has to offer) is the drug and the man seeking it is the addict. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you or trying to argue. It seems you have more of a black and white perspective on this than I do. I'm genuinely curious and just looking to converse on it

So congress critters can violate any law in the land as per the constitutional oversight clause?

it's like wordle but with college wrestlers. every day it's a different wrestler from the 2025 NCAA tournament field. i have no association with it, just thought it was fun and thought i'd share https://www.gablegame.com/

I mean he played himself so he did a great job as a wrestling announcer next to Dan Gable. He definitely had fun with it, but the rest of the movie was mostly predictable cliches mixed with some hokey religious stuff.

Kind of. It wasn't as explicit as other movies but it was still there.

You are a smart intelligent man. You were in the military, and you know all about protocols. There is a certain protocol in exercising those oversight duties. Because you're a mayor or congressman that does not exempt you from having to use those proper protocols.

hmmm, i don't think you know as much about the sex work industry as you think you do. maybe where we're disagreeing here (i'm trying to understand your viewpoint in good faith) is you think the majority of sex workers are coerced, whereas in my experience, this seems impractical and the vast majority are willing participants for whom sex work is a positive outlet for them. either way, agree to respectfully disagree.

in this scenario, the woman being forced to solicit the sex act is the drug addict. are you able to honestly say that you think this was his first time? and if not could you then honestly say that the encounters before this were ALL consensual? no, i don't think calling him that is too far.