I'm not trolling, I'm trying to define the word leader in a way which makes it a valuable commodity as opposed to an archetype that gets dropped by default on the best wrestler in the room.
Example, people on here, confident of his role as a leader, have described how Taylor must be a tremendous teacher and mentor for Aaron Brooks and Bo Nickal, then we find out he refused to wrestle Brooks for years and hid an injury NIckal so he wouldn't be able to medal at his weight at worlds. Does this disqualify him from leader status? Does a leader have to embody an institution and put its needs before theirs? Or can you just be a really good example of how to wrestle and train?