All he had to do after making that tweet was what Kozak did. Finishing by saying “hey Mr Kozak let’s get together to discuss. Lmk what time works for you”. Pretty simple.
What he perceived to be an injustice. Yet he gives zero rebuttal to what he thinks should have happened instead nor why?????? I’ve been presented a situation like this many times. Always handled it one on one with the other individual.
He gave no rebuttals or reasoning for why he thought it was wrong. How does he expect to get it changed without direct dialogue with the guy that did it ??? Pressuring him publicly???
So then this coach either A.) Has the time to understand it and make the comments he did OR B.) He doesn’t have the time and probably shouldn’t make the comments he did. Which do you think it is???
Even the smallest staffs have 3-4 coaches. Good learning experience for one coach to be in charge of understanding those differences. Most on here do it with full time jobs.