Caveira

Dean Cain has a bachelors degree too. What’s your point?

I am more curious about this question. Trump is doing something about it. Early Trump or late Trump meh. He’s doing something. why did the biden admin do 0? And now why are Ds so hostile on a topic they didn’t care one bit about during their reign?

I suppose similar to a bartender being a highly qualified us representative?

The outrage. Sydney Sweeney is getting more press. I mean as a dictator on day 1… who was literally going to end democracy. Who exactly does he answer to? He could just delete the whole thing and replace it with a McDonalds happy meal menu if he wanted right?

And USA Today, Fox, the hill, the New York post, the guardian, prolly your fav brietbart news. To name a few news orgs that have articles out in the last few days.

Ya. Trump tried to digitally erase the constitution lol. Y’all are sometimes whack. Ever hear of this site? It tracks changes on almost a trillion different web sites… I work in tech sales my customers notice a contract change almost immediately. “They” noticed lol Whatever https://web.archive.org looks like there were 68 changes to that page you posted above this year… and 548 changes since 2019.

I mean it’s gone viral. https://trending.knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-is-the-septum-ring-theory-the-alleged-secret-meaning-of-having-a-septum-piercing-explained

Is it fair? More importantly is it accurate? Here is a video for those that are not familiar with this popular theory.

First blue jeans now Dunkin donuts hired someone to sound like a Nazi? USA Today compares it to Sweeney https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/07/31/dunkin-ad-gavin-casalegno-genetics/85464941007/

Not just back. Was a coding error. Trump didn’t have a hand in this. I think Trump is asking @uncle bernard for a formal apology. Or so I’m told Library of Congress blames "coding error" for missing sections of online Constitution The Library of Congress on Wednesday pointed to an unspecified "coding error" that led to key parts of the U.S. Constitution being deleted from the Constitution Annotated website. Why it matters: The missing sections included foundational provisions, such as the right to habeas corpus — which protects people from unlawful detention — and the foreign emoluments clause. Those constitutional principles have risen to the forefront of political and legal debate amid the president's immigration crackdown and foreign dealings. As of Wednesday around 2p.m. ET, the text had been restored. Driving the news: As highlightedby tech news site TechCrunch, an archived version of the website shows that a chunk of Article I Section 8 was cut, in addition to the entirety of Sections 9 and 10 of Article I. According to captures from the Wayback Machine, those sections were present as recently as mid-July. What they're saying: "It has been brought to our attention that some sections of Article 1 are missing from the Constitution Annotated ...website," the Library of Congress said in a statement posted to social media. "We've learned that this is due to a coding error." A banner across the top of the site read, "The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience." Links for certain provisions included in those sections, such as Section 9's text on ex post facto laws, directed to an error page that read "Page Not Found" with a portrait of George Washington. That page has since been restored. The Library of Congress did not immediately respond to Axios' request for further information.

Help me understand your argument. compare some rando nonsense state senator’s idiot kids statement. To say…. One of the longest standing us senator’s in us history + us president’s kids moronic statements. Whom has a bigger audience and or more influence?

Since you like word games. Here is what/why you said you didn’t care about the guy asking to murder Ice members was worth well…. Whatever. I’ll pop it to the top for you. Copy paste of your quote below: In bold This (R) bat shyte crazy lady has 1,649 followers on Twitter…. From what I can see this Sort of proves you are a hypocrite when it comes to your teams morons vs the other teams morons don’t you think? Are a lot of people agreeing with her? I don’t really see any… Yes, what this guy said is reprehensible (and the random pediatrician too while we’re at it). But no, I don’t particularly care what some random person that no one knows says, on either side of the aisle, unless it’s something that a lot of people are saying. And if a lot of people are saying it that usually includes people that we actually know who they are.

Rather than say I think he is less prominent but asking for the murder of government officials is bad. You play word games.

I can remind you of what you said here. Basically crazy people say crazy things but who cares. But your outrage over some crazy R saying crazy things is different. Or so I’m told.

No she just said horrible dumb shyte…. And should be condemned. Some D candidate in Texas promoted murdering ice agents. Which one is worse in your opinion?

You know what they tweeted. And you’re playing word games and you know it.

They neglected his blackness or his whiteness… somehow slipped out of their narrative this time.

Also … before it comes out. If that really is the guy. Why is the media not reporting on it. Had to find it on Twitter. It’s been out on Twitter for hours.

I noticed. They are not using the word possibly or likely this time. Learn their lesson or not fit their motive?

Minding my own business on my way to my fav wnba game https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16M45PCEj7/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Maybe she’s mad she lost her job? or a money grab … is she making a song?

Murder is bad boss.

There was a more prominent person running for office for reals in Texas calling for the murder of ice agents. Meh on some dip shyte daughter saying dumb *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me*. I don’t recall you giving a shyte about that.

As a person who didn’t sample or purchase the product. You neglected to explain why your opinion should carry weight. Help me understand why your opinion should carry weight here?

For the record I don’t know who she is. But she’s upset about it for some reason.