if you want to elaborate more on where my opinion is wrong, i'm all ears. looks like it was more just another opportunity for you to insult me without putting out any information or discussion of the topic though.
you seem think everyone needs to hold the same opinion as you and that if you hold the majority opinion that makes you right or superior in some sense. i'm sorry this wasn't the echo chamber you were hoping for
i'm not here to troll. i've disputed some claims, and i've discussed the topic. nhs has made multiple posts now insulting me without any discussion of the forum topic
again, you've contributed nothing. so far you just want to get into a p*ssing contest, but if you would like to discuss the topic, i'm willing to engage.
it is patently false to describe what has been reported as a felony. there could be more details yet to be reported that could make it rise to the level of a felony, but as reported, that is false. just take the L and move on dude.
you said it was a felony. show me the felony charges. show me the reporting that aligns with a felony charge. what has been published fits the description of a misdemeanor. it was also reported that he was released at the scene, which fits with a misdemeanor offense.
yeah. you take a physical infidelity (what he did) and an emotional affair (what he didn't do) and combine them for a full-on affair. it's reasonable to think it's worse to have both than to have only one. even if you disagree, it isn't a hard concept to understand for anyone with an IQ above room temperature
the highlighted idea that having emotionless sex with a prostitute is less bad than having a full-blown affair with someone is not a new idea and it's a fairly common belief. There is a logic to it if you stopped grasping your pearls long enough to think about it for a moment.
there are people who have been trafficked that work on farms, in factories, etc.
The vast, vast majority of sex workers do what they do of their own volition.