red viking

a person whose gender identity aligns with their sex assigned at birth.

The " lover" doesn't matter. The cis white male from radical winger Christian gun fanatic family murdered kirk. Not a trans person. Facts suck, huh?

Show me where I said I would. Lying scumbag.

Lack of comprehension skills. I NEVER SAID I'll post my flag burning parties on YouTube. Read more carefully. You know what "if" means? Look it up.

That's a 110% lie. I never said I'd do it on YouTube. Show me where I said that you simple minded piece of toilet trash lying scumbag.

Sorter is a rt wing extremist. Nice try though.

Booker destroyed him

I don't make any threats, EVER. If I'm gonna do something, I just do it. I don't forecast it

Winger fbi said she was fully coopetating

He's a white cis male from rt wing extremist family. He's the murderer. Trans partner did nothing and is fully cooperating.

That word is hilarious. Here's a quick AI answer. As of September 2025, far-right activist Laura Loomer is not a formal White House adviser but is widely considered one of President Donald Trump's most influential unofficial advisers. Her influence has been demonstrated through her involvement in the firing of administration staff and her direct access to the president. Influence on personnel decisions National Security firings: In April 2025, Loomer met with Trump in the Oval Office and reportedly presented a list of National Security Council officials she accused of disloyalty. Trump subsequently fired several of the individuals she identified. High-level replacements: Loomer has taken credit for identifying more than a dozen government officials who were later fired or pushed out. Her targets have included national security personnel and staff she deemed disloyal to the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement. "Independent agency" vetting: Loomer has referred to her work as operating an "independent agency" to vet people within the administration and identify disloyal individuals for removal. She uses her social media platform to publicly target officials if her private warnings to the president are not acted upon. Relationship dynamics Direct access: Loomer has a direct line of communication to the president and has attended events with him, including traveling on his private plane. Presidential acknowledgement: Trump has publicly praised Loomer, calling her a "patriot" and an "amazing" woman. He has also acknowledged that he listens to her recommendations. Opposition from staff: Many Trump aides have expressed concern about Loomer's influence, and some reportedly worked to prevent Trump from giving her an official job during his 2024 campaign. White House staff have engaged in a balancing act of trying to manage her influence while keeping her at a distance. Criticism from Republicans: Loomer's public commentary has drawn condemnation from other Republicans, such as when Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene called her remarks about Kamala Harris "appalling and extremely racist". Unofficial status Despite her significant influence, Loomer has been denied an official position, which she claims is due to professional jealousy from other staff. While Trump has offered her positions, they have reportedly been blocked by others within his administration. Loomer has continued to operate as an external enforcer, using her platform to pressure the administration from the outside.

Trump DOES take her seriously though. She appears to be one of his closest advisors.

Don't know about that, but many people are calling for people to be fired for criticizing Charlie Kirk. Laura Loomer for example.

Never said I was going to do that.

Yes; that's the issue I have. Keep deflecting though.

Yes, firing somebody from federal govt employment (not using company devices and not during work hours) simply for criticizing him.

Talking about federal government. This is another winger deflection.

You're changing the subject. That's completely different, and I can see an argument for that, but depends upon the job and the associated contract and work rules. Not much more to say than that. The constant wingers deflections are unreal and cowardly.

Absolutely not, but employers in the pvt sector should have that right and also public sector if their work rules explicitly allow it. Firing somebody for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk? VERY dangerous slope you're on there because it's gonna end up going both ways, eventually. Be careful what you wish for. THis is very different from celebrating his death, so I think you're really trying to change the subject here because you don't want to deal with the issue.

110% true that the extreme wingers are pushing for this. Look it up.

Don't know, but many on the right are pushing for this. It will likely happen under this administration (if it hasn't already) and also at other levels of government where wingers are in control.

Getting fired simply for saying that Charlie was an idiot, liar, etc? Simply because he's dead? Celebrating his murder is clearly wrong, but the vast majority of the talk about him from the left, including on here, is not doing that at all. Be careful what you wish for, because what goes around comes around. Maybe during the next administration we'll fire anybody that criticizes lefty political activists. Or does it only count as bad after they've been assassinated? Is this what you truly want? Lots of problems here with the hypocritical wingers.

This is a lie. BLM is generally FOR body cams, but there are some nuances here. Body cams don't eradicate police misconduct and there are complaints about misuse of body cams. Don't know what that is, but they are still generally FOR the body cams.

Lmfao. He didn't celebrate it, plus it's an anonymous board.

Let's assume not.