Mike Parrish

Also, hosted on youtube and NOT A SINGLE STUTTER in the stream. Pay attention USAW/UWW.

Do you know where the brackets are?

Why not make this change next year?

Not seeing much to enjoy at 55kg... Weight seems depopulated of the usual hammers who infested it when Dom was wrestling there.

I do

The Fulp-Allen sisters would like a word...

No, it won't. Under what premise do you see legislation making it through a divided congress and then being approved by Joe Biden? And if the law changes, these causes of action won't be able to be litigated under the newly revised law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law It's like you're just making shit up here.

Tonya Harding style?

Trump (his track record for litigation is embarrassing) Liberty Center with a single person lawsuit on the books since 2020 and going nowhere fast according to Pacer This weirdo(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Ayyadurai) That's not a lawsuit. That's a law that is almost certainly going to be ruled unconstitutional when it reaches the Fifth Circuit If that's all you've got, then I don't see any danger to Big Tech and/or Social Media...

https://www-japan--wrestling-jp.translate.goog/2022/12/21/200394/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp I only see Nanami

53kg has: Mukaida Fujinami Okuno Wow.

UWW rules for next year at the ranking tournaments are +2kg

You've provided nothing that's even remotely compelling.

lol. OK, little buddy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veracity_of_statements_by_Donald_Trump

What spastic madness is this new horror?

The only lawsuits regarding Twitter are for failure to abide by California employment law. Post links to the lawsuits, please.

Lots and lots of typing, yet still nothing actionable. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/actionable If these are the silver bullets/smoking guns, then where are the lawsuits and indictments?

If the national inquirer said aliens were running the post office, you would discount that because NI has a less than casual relationship with the truth. Just like Project Veritas. I have seen ZERO law enforcement actions that would lend credence to the naked assertion that Twitter perjured themselves in court. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

No, dude. A newer, more crazy swamp creature moved in. I give Twitter about 6 months before it makes the current MySpace look good.

Streaming through youtube. YEAH, BAYBEE! YEAH! https://www-japan--wrestling-jp.translate.goog/2022/12/22/200776/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp (links to youtube streams inside the link above) Schedule by day and weight https://www-japan--wrestling-jp.translate.goog/2022/12/22/200752/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Scratch weight, correct?

I didn't say "it's not real". I said there doesn't appear to be anything illegal. This seems to be a sticking point for you guys here. You're *OUTRAGED* but you guys can't point to any illegal behavior and you don't have an answer for what you want done. I suspect most social media companies operate in much the same manner. I've posted here before (or at the other place) that social media is brain poison. Expecting social media companies to behave differently is a fool's errand, especially if you can't point to illegality and you can't come up with proposed changes... Well, then you need to reread what I wrote, because you seem to be constructing a strawman here. You do realize that neither of Trump's impeachments were based on the Steele work product? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump

Post your evidence. There's lots of outrage and thrashing so far, but not much in the way of convincing arguments.

You are making the assertion that *something is terribly wrong*. The burden of making that case is borne by the person making the assertion. You have failed to do so. You make lots and lots of unsupported assertions. Then you get frustrated when everybody doesn't immediately agree with you.