Jump to content

uncle bernard

Members
  • Posts

    1,530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

uncle bernard's Achievements

NCAA All-American

NCAA All-American (12/14)

  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Year In
  • Very Popular
  • One Month Later
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

211

Reputation

  1. It's a joke you moron. He's using a joke to point out that if you build a wall, they'll just find a way around it and there needs to be a better solution. Which is why he ends the sentence with "That won't stop this." "Can anyone ever just admit when someone says something stupid regardless if they support them politically or not instead of trying to use mental gymnastics and word play to deflect away from what they said...sheesh " CORRECT. Tim Walz clearly did not say he wanted to build ladders for illegal immigrants to climb a wall. Just admit it.
  2. no he said he would *invest* in the ladder company. a normal functioning person understands that joke, but i’ll explain it to you guys. he invests in the ladder company to make money because they’ll be selling so many ladders to climb over the wall. this is so bad, man. you guys can barely speak english.
  3. @Husker_Du "supported George Floyd riots" another great opportunity to change your opinion when confronted with new facts
  4. 1) He literally called in the national guard. 2) not what he said. basic reading comp failure on your part here. 3) bad idea, but not seeing anything showing any significant action tied to this. people weren't getting their neighbors arrested for not wearing masks. but yeah, bad idea. 4) When? 5) This one is iffy, but on him. He was promoted to the rank he claimed, but retired before he finished the necessary training, which resulted in him being demoted at retirement 6) He retired to run for office, specifically on an anti-war message. He didn't believe in Iraq and put his money where his mouth was and voted against the war when elected. And guess what? He was right!
  5. Well, it's not actually what happened to start. Pedophiles are not protected for their "sexual orientation" by the bill. I assume the trans lawmaker wanted to take it out because 1) it's unnecessary. pedophilia is already illegal. and this language already exists elsewhere in minnesota law. 2) people unfairly accuse trans people of being pedophiles. they don't want the word anywhere near language that is ostensibly about them. And I'm now reading that another amendment was added putting the language back in place, so this whole thing is about nothing. And Tim Walz had nothing to do with it anyway.
  6. that's possible, but i don't see how you can say it's a given. at what point would you start to reconsider if Kamala's numbers are still good? october?
  7. So if Kamala enters election day with a significant lead across all polls, you would still say she has a 0% chance of winning?
  8. what would you have to see to change your mind?
  9. I'm not cherry-picking. She's gained ground in every single poll. It's clearly *competitive* now. That's all I want you to admit. It is laughable on its face to still say that Harris can't win this race.
  10. then why did you say it? why would any kind of abuse ever be okay, even if it were part of Israel's protocols? that's the point. i've condemned every act of terror by hamas. you guys refuse to acknowledge that israel is committing its own war crimes. i'm consistent. your morality is entirely determined by which side you're rooting for.
  11. who would have thought having an entirely new candidate could change the race? @PortaJohn
  12. This is definitely true with the caveat that the sources that skew right skew much more intensely than the ones who skew left. Fox is much farther from the center than CNN, ABC, NBC, etc... And Fox is such a giant that it matches the influence of all the center-left media outlets put together.
  13. THAT'S WHAT YOU SAID! And given the opportunity to back down, you obfuscated. "IF....and that is a big IF...any of these reports are true and this goes against Israel's protocol for interrogating prisoners then whomever did it should be held accountable"
×
×
  • Create New...