Wokesters flipping out over an Ad about blue jeans.

[JimmySpeaks]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re not going to call out @JimmySpeaks for saying libs did it?  Thanks for confirming your obvious bias.

Someone cares so little about it that he can’t stop,commenting on it.  You can’t make it up. 

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re not going to call out @JimmySpeaks for saying libs did it?  Thanks for confirming your obvious bias.

I don’t know Jimmy.  But I think he’s poking fun at you because you say it isn’t in the news and it continues to be.  
 

what’s to call him out for?

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Someone cares so little about it that he can’t stop,commenting on it.  You can’t make it up. 

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

Ya. It’s my thread soooooooo 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

I’m just having fun watching you not care 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

I don’t know Jimmy.  But I think he’s poking fun at you because you say it isn’t in the news and it continues to be.  
 

what’s to call him out for?

He posted this, blaming this vandalism on libs.  

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

https://abc7.com/post/california-billboard-vandalized-proud-boys-message-references-sydney-sweeney-jeans-ad/17465388/#
 

they don’t care so much that they’re vandalizing billboards of Sydney 

So I posted this quote from the article where it said they don’t know who did it.

21 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

“There's no indication the banner was placed over the billboard by members of the Proud Boys, or by someone else just trying to stir controversy.”

 

 

Then you replied to me and accused that of being a “twisty blurb.” Which for one, it wasn’t.  And I think it’s funny that you called out that innocuous blurb as being twisty, but didn’t call out Jimmy for blaming the vandalism on libs despite no evidence.

18 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Possibly white ?   The liberal news outlets would never add a twisty blurb to poke at the repubs would they ?

 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Ya. It’s my thread soooooooo 

Thank you for confirming that conservatives care more about this “controversy” far more than any other group

[JimmySpeaks]

12 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Thank you for confirming that conservatives care more about this “controversy” far more than any other group

So you’re a conservative now huh?  Got it. 

[Caveira]

24 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

He posted this, blaming this vandalism on libs.  

So I posted this quote from the article where it said they don’t know who did it.

Then you replied to me and accused that of being a “twisty blurb.” Which for one, it wasn’t.  And I think it’s funny that you called out that innocuous blurb as being twisty, but didn’t call out Jimmy for blaming the vandalism on libs despite no evidence.

 

Politically neutral journalism

—> the police have no suspects at this time.  

politically motivated journalism 

—> there is no evidence that a black guy did this, but we have not ruled that out.

 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

Someone on here sure ASSumes a lot. 

[1032004]

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you’re a conservative now huh?  Got it. 

Unlike some others, I didn’t say no one but conservatives was talking about this.  But conservatives are talking about it way more, as you have proven.

[red viking]

42 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Someone on here sure ASSumes a lot. 

So...question for the  crazed wingers. What % of liberals are really bothered by that Sweeney ad do u think?

[Caveira]

49 minutes ago, red viking said:

So...question for the  crazed wingers. What % of liberals are really bothered by that Sweeney ad do u think?

I’ll start counting.   7 distinct ones here.  
 

 

a better question might be.  Of the large volume of whiners….. what % are both female and have a nose ring.    

[Caveira]

54 minutes ago, red viking said:

So...question for the  crazed wingers. What % of liberals are really bothered by that Sweeney ad do u think?

Here is one off cAmara screaming racist at literal Sydney Sweeney.   Why yell at Sydney here I thought no one cared???   

 

 

 

For the purposes of counting female + nose ring can you mis-gender a lady who is off camera?  
 

Today things are so complicated.   I will go off on a limb.   Potentially female.   But no nose ring.  

 

Bonus for @1032004 here as this is TMZ reporting on it.  

Edited 2 hours ago by Caveira

[1032004]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Here is one off cAmara screaming racist at literal Sydney Sweeney.   Why yell at Sydney here I thought no one cared???   

 

 

 

For the purposes of counting female + nose ring can you mis-gender a lady who is off camera?  
 

Today things are so complicated.   I will go off on a limb.   Potentially female.   But no nose ring.  

 

Bonus for @1032004 here as this is TMZ reporting on it.  

TMZ “reporting on it,” yet you saw it via a clip from a conservative x poster. And lol at saying “Democrats are the party of violence” because someone said “stop the ad, that is being racist.”

Not to mention I wouldn’t totally rule out that being a sarcastic comment, especially since the person isn’t even on camera.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

So...question for the  crazed wingers. What % of liberals are really bothered by that Sweeney ad do u think?

A lot more than you’ll ever admit. 

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

TMZ “reporting on it,” yet you saw it via a clip from a conservative x poster. And lol at saying “Democrats are the party of violence” because someone said “stop the ad, that is being racist.”

Not to mention I wouldn’t totally rule out that being a sarcastic comment, especially since the person isn’t even on camera.

Always with the libtard wokester excuses 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Unlike some others, I didn’t say no one but conservatives was talking about this.  But conservatives are talking about it way more, as you have proven.

Wrong.  You’re still talking about it and you don’t care. 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Wrong.  You’re still talking about it and you don’t care. 

But I’m talking about it less than you 

[JimmySpeaks]

20 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

But I’m talking about it less than you 

Again and again 

[Caveira]

27 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

TMZ “reporting on it,” yet you saw it via a clip from a conservative x poster. And lol at saying “Democrats are the party of violence” because someone said “stop the ad, that is being racist.”

Not to mention I wouldn’t totally rule out that being a sarcastic comment, especially since the person isn’t even on camera.

She looked like she was in fear.  You should be more respectful of women’s rights.   Especially if it was a man yelling at her.  

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

She looked like she was in fear.  You should be more respectful of women’s rights.   Especially if it was a man yelling at her.  

Lol she didn’t even react 

[JimmySpeaks]

People on Reddit are still commenting away two weeks later.