Wokesters flipping out over an Ad about blue jeans.

[JimmySpeaks]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re not going to call out @JimmySpeaks for saying libs did it?  Thanks for confirming your obvious bias.

Someone cares so little about it that he can’t stop,commenting on it.  You can’t make it up. 

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re not going to call out @JimmySpeaks for saying libs did it?  Thanks for confirming your obvious bias.

I don’t know Jimmy.  But I think he’s poking fun at you because you say it isn’t in the news and it continues to be.  
 

what’s to call him out for?

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Someone cares so little about it that he can’t stop,commenting on it.  You can’t make it up. 

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

Ya. It’s my thread soooooooo 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Pretty sure you’ve posted in this thread far more than me

I’m just having fun watching you not care 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

I don’t know Jimmy.  But I think he’s poking fun at you because you say it isn’t in the news and it continues to be.  
 

what’s to call him out for?

He posted this, blaming this vandalism on libs.  

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

https://abc7.com/post/california-billboard-vandalized-proud-boys-message-references-sydney-sweeney-jeans-ad/17465388/#
 

they don’t care so much that they’re vandalizing billboards of Sydney 

So I posted this quote from the article where it said they don’t know who did it.

21 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

“There's no indication the banner was placed over the billboard by members of the Proud Boys, or by someone else just trying to stir controversy.”

 

 

Then you replied to me and accused that of being a “twisty blurb.” Which for one, it wasn’t.  And I think it’s funny that you called out that innocuous blurb as being twisty, but didn’t call out Jimmy for blaming the vandalism on libs despite no evidence.

18 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Possibly white ?   The liberal news outlets would never add a twisty blurb to poke at the repubs would they ?

 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Ya. It’s my thread soooooooo 

Thank you for confirming that conservatives care more about this “controversy” far more than any other group

[JimmySpeaks]

12 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Thank you for confirming that conservatives care more about this “controversy” far more than any other group

So you’re a conservative now huh?  Got it. 

[Caveira]

24 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

He posted this, blaming this vandalism on libs.  

So I posted this quote from the article where it said they don’t know who did it.

Then you replied to me and accused that of being a “twisty blurb.” Which for one, it wasn’t.  And I think it’s funny that you called out that innocuous blurb as being twisty, but didn’t call out Jimmy for blaming the vandalism on libs despite no evidence.

 

Politically neutral journalism

—> the police have no suspects at this time.  

politically motivated journalism 

—> there is no evidence that a black guy did this, but we have not ruled that out.

 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

Someone on here sure ASSumes a lot. 

[1032004]

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you’re a conservative now huh?  Got it. 

Unlike some others, I didn’t say no one but conservatives was talking about this.  But conservatives are talking about it way more, as you have proven.

[red viking]

42 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Someone on here sure ASSumes a lot. 

So...question for the  crazed wingers. What % of liberals are really bothered by that Sweeney ad do u think?