I can’t speak for others, but I don’t have a dog in the fight or care who they wrestle for…I just like to watch good wrestling. Maybe by good I mean aggressive, but my assumption is that most spectators enjoyed the Lilledahl and MM matches much more because they went after it to get their team as many points as possible. In my opinion, Starocci was more focused on winning his match than team points. Would he have been more aggressive and tried to score more if they were the first match of the night instead of after the team points didn’t matter so much? Who knows. But as someone else said, I would have thought a four-timer would have taken it to a true frosh more. But to your point, it’s just his style. For me, as a spectator, it’s not enjoyable…but he gets the wins.
When I say artificial stalling, I guess I feel like edge wrestling and push out stuff shouldn’t be called stalling. Call it something else, I say. Stalling is when you’re not wrestling because you’re tired or not trying to score. Ferrari was active and attempted a few shots, but because he wrestled near the edge, he was called for stalling. Do I think edge wrestling is ok so that you have an “out” in case your opponent takes a shot? No, and it’s the right call. I just don’t like it being called stalling. Maybe call it edging?