Tripnsweep

If I had to guess from my experience in immigration court, most of those waived their right to do so, or agreed to be deported, both of which would negate the need to be seen before a judge.

I have seen her wrestle before and she's just constantly improving. She has that Kendall Cross type build, and just makes it work for her.

I saw that high school junior Everest Leydecker is in the finals at 55kg.

Saw that noted fork and spoon operator Eve Berrington competed at 68kg for women. Spent about 3 minutes on the mat total in both matches, then off to social media about how great of a warrior she is and could have won but her opponents got lucky. Also she's never won a match at the open in 5 years.

Except when that is recommended, it happens 99% of the time. Unless there's some compelling evidence he forgot to present.

Probably not by cutting funding like Trump did. Good place to start.

That isn't what the Constitution says.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Wrong.

He did get due process. I don't think you understand what due process is. Generally, unless there's a specific reason, bar complaints like this are run similarly to any court proceeding. People can testify, produce evidence, etc. Due process doesn't necessarily mean it has to take place in court, and since Eastman isn't charged with committing a crime in California, he is in a half dozen other states though, the California bar is taking steps to discipline him due to his conduct. So yes he has had his day in court and they still recommended to suspend him, which is on hold pending his appeal. If there was no due process involved, they wouldn't wait. Him being charged with several felonies in various states weighs heavily on this because he violated ethical and professional conduct. So even if he manages to escape being convicted or pleading guilty, the bar still believes he acted improperly and will take action to discipline him because of his conduct.

He's been disbarred. Unless there's some compelling reason that he neglected to mention, his appeal will most likely be denied.

That's usually how it works. It just lacks the formality, which comes later, but in most cases a state bar association recommending disbarment is pretty serious. They wouldn't do that unless they felt like there were serious ethical rules broken, or other problems. In Eastman's case, what he did was so breathtakingly stupid, and then instead of apologizing he doubled down, they aren't left with much choice.

Pretty much. Unless there's something they missed in the hearing about it. Or there's new evidence that hasn't been seen. We had a former county attorney who got disbarred for basically doing the same kind of thing.

Costanza 13:7 "It's not a lie, if you believe it!"

https://www.courthousenews.com/former-trump-lawyer-appeals-disbarment-recommendation-over-role-in-2020-election/ He's appealing it of course, but it's like pissing into the wind if they're recommending you be disbarred.

You know Eastman got disbarred for his dishonesty right?