ThreePointTakedown

Also, puts restrictions on trans kids competing in sports K-12 and at the college level outside of their assigned gender at birth. Good idea? Why or why not? How many kids are we talking about? What are the implications on the lives of the citizens effected(kids and parents)? Good or bad? Anyone live in Ohio, how do you feel this will effect your state? Good or bad? Everyone else, does this change your opinion of Ohio? Which direction?

Who are you trying to convince with this desperate attempt at getting attention? Your experience is irrelevant. If that is all you have to inform your opinions, so are you.

Posting articles and asking me to use my time to go through them is intellectually lazy on your part. Also, I try to give my time to people who are honest and you are not. J actually tries to have a conversation. Less on dunking and calling people Jr. to make themselves feel superior. As if not dying is some how a flex. You should have an opinion on what they bring to the table. As you didn't, I just assume you want me to waste my time as those articles and your opinions are a waste of time.

Well done. I knew you could do it. Whoever that was to, I'll bet they appreciate you being vulnerable and bearing your soul. Doesn't it feel good? Like a weight lifted off your shoulders. Maybe you've turned a new leaf.

I'm sorry if you feel I'm slow. Like I said, I don't know if it was meant for me. If you go back through the entirety of this conversation. I've tried to explain myself as well as I could. I don't feel you've done the same(maybe I'm wrong and that's the best you can do) and you scare people away from a conversation. I don't feel you've made clearly articulated points or else I feel this conversation would've gone differently.

I can't read your mind or discern your criteria. Do you consider yourself an honest person?

Is that who you intended the comment towards?

To whomever it was intended to. Like I said before, I can't answer that. As you were not clear. Still haven't been.

Its an opportunity to apologies like I did. Take the high road. Be vulnerable. Are capable of doing that at all?

You typed it and you weren't specific. That's why I asked in the first place. You are the only one that can answer that question. Will you?

Do you feel bad, at all, about calling someone slow in a conversation?

Love time stamps. You're not the good guy. Try to be better.

You're not testing people you are just dishonest. You're a bully and you lash out exactly like every cliché of a bully. I pity you.

Likewise

I don't ever recall you saying that. I think that's an excuse you're telling yourself to pretend to be the good guy.

I never said you should trust me. Where was that? His experience holds no weight in this conversation until he demonstrate why. He hasn't yet. Why should I or anyone listen to him and his experience? Its like me listening to your experience. I have no reason to trust that you're telling the truth because you have a hard time living in reality. 'Nu uh, you don't live in reality' Ya I know what you're going to say.

Didn't you call someone in this chat 'slow'?

I'm sorry for calling you names. You don't deserve that. You're just trolling on a message board for fun. Are you trying to be constructive? No. I know that. The way you engage all but admits it. Why do you think you do it? Is there a reason? Just to stir up crap? Why does that do it for you? Have you thought about it? Also, can you tell me what Marxism is?

Definitely unique. Coming from a guy that has now made it is mission to stir the pot as far as higher education(not that it couldn't use a good stir considering the recent settlements of tuition gauging). I don't mind a guy going to war with elite schools to clean them up and cull some of the old growth. Might be a good thing. Not sure DEI is a great avenue for that. Tell me why I should listen to a hedge fund manager about DEI? What research has he done or absorbed that would make him a trusted figure on the subject? Keep in mind, any anecdotes he has are irrelevant. Why are you siting known racist, Stephen Miller? What point could he possibly make that isn't tainted already? You say 'another example' what is it your examples are trying to point out? Engineering: Wow. Pretty cold response from a father. The gender point, I get it. That's fair. But she has experience and perspective that, I would imagine, most engineers don't have. Wouldn't the field of engineering be better with her life experience and perspective? Lets leave out skill and schooling. Lets just assume she's on par with an average engineer as far as knowledge. Might she be able to see things in a way that others might not considering how she arrived in the field?

I'm sorry you're a hypocrite. Only calling out name calling when its directed at someone you defend. In the entire conversation I asked questions to get clarity. If that threatens you, you and your ideas are the problem. Because you don't have the wherewithal to answer my questions to a satisfying extent is your lack of knowledge, creativity, or self awareness that your position is crap. You all answer the questions, if at all, that you know won't paint you into a corner. And you get upset when I point out you are dishonest(you are). Then you all feel attacked and lash out like toddlers wanting a cookie. You're embarrassing. I don't like the idea that people like you exist and spread your stupid in the same circles as I do. You make our community dumber. Here come the names again, have at it losers!

Fair point. But does the company have a right to protect its product from someone or something trying to steal the IP? You can say this isn't an attempt to do that, but it very could be. You don't know for sure. So far, the article mentioned that no evidence of tampering/hacking has happened. That there are issues that could have been but weren't, is not reason enough to pull it apart to look for discrepancies. That process needs to be done during the production/contract process. If the process is so important, and I agree that it is, the governing body should've dug into it before not after the fact. You can agree that they had an opportunity to do all this prior to the actual voting? They did not or not to enough of an extent to discover the weaknesses. This looks like, now, that they don't like the results and are looking for any way to muddy the outcome because they lost. Do a better job on the front end and this wouldn't be a problem.

" When the workers, content, and outcomes reflect examples like what we've seen with diversity quotas in business. " Not sure what this means. Can you elaborate? I understand you believe that about DEI. But is that actually the case? Are there examples of that happening? With regards to engineering, is the field or practice of engineering better off with your daughter's perspective and experience?

So you're a moron. Got it.

So you are afraid. Got it.

So you don't want it better or for people with no health care to have anything, let alone better. That sounds kinda selfish. Are you from the selfish generation? Sounds like it. Want to whine more about the VA or unions. You've got yours. Screw everyone else. Go yell at clouds.