El Luchador

Well you can't define it so it's difficult to know. It's an assault weapon if it looks like an assault weapon. Forgive my ignorance. As long as we're making issues out of inconsequential weapon based on Hollywood depiction I suggest the Trebuchet. They are completely unregulated unregistered and can be made without government oversight. Ghost Trebuchets should not be legal, should not be allowed near schools and should require a strict background check and licensing. A true weapon of war capable of mass casualties. If it saves even 1 life it's worth it.

Or were you concerned about these:

I assumed you didn't know, never said I didn't know. Armor vehicles mounted artillery doesn't seem to be real relevant to a discussion about guns. You again make an argument over a situation that doesn't exist as if it's a huge problem facing Americans.

Guess which one is the most common Deer cartridge?

Great example of a complete non issue.

No love for Mel?

I'm not against guns just weapons of war. So that would be the Winchester model 70, it was used by Carlos Hathcock in Vietnam, the Remington model 700, used as the short range marksman rifle, the Ithaca pump action 12 gauge, used as a WW1 trench gun, the Colt 1911 std issue side arm from WW1 till the 1980s, the Beretta 92, used by Mel Gibson in lethal weapon but also by the US military replacing the 1911, the Sig sauer 320 now having replaced the Beretta 92, the Glock 19 used by Seals, and the Sig 226 it replaced. The colt SAA carried by General Patton, the Springfield Trapdoor single shot 45-70 attributed to thw defeat of Custer, the Winchester lever action, Springfield 1903, the M1, the flint lock, the muzzle loader.... So basically everything

Clearly you do not. Explain to me what defines a deer rifle. The gun I most use for deer hunting is a Remington 7400. Is that not an assault rifle. It's not plastic, shares no cosmetic features of a bushmaster other than it has a stock and forearm and trigger. But I can tell you with certainty it is a far more deadly rifle. Also do you know what a cannon is? Or is that more hyperbole?

Still crickets

No armed security in schools, and no gun safety in schools, teach victim hood ignore personal responsibility, and say we want to reduce gun violence. This issue is almost 100 percent a reflection of the society created by leftist ideology. Violence in media, video games and on the internet but it's a gun issue.

And why were so many officers there for a traffic stop

It actually is. It was first coined by an anti gun group to render an emotional response. It has no practical or specific meaning in the actual gun and military world. It is pure and simple hyperbole. Old man Pelosi was assaulted with hammer there for assault hammer is accurate, I was attacked with a sawed off golf club modified to make it more concealable therefore an assault golf club. Repeating the meaningless term will never make it accurate.

Critical thinking: regurgitating leftist ideology catch phrases programed during indoctrination under the guise of education.

Are you willing to accept that if a gun can be used for hunting then it is protected?

That is a just plain stupid. Another catch phrase with no actual definition bit being vague is the SOP of the left. Hyperbole is all you got.

You sure like to ignore the fact that the main battle rifle issued to the military is not available to the general public, ones with similar looks are. You straight up want to ban guns and you'll start with what is easiest to gain an emotional response over.

False statements. Guns are made to hunt, for recreational fun and for self defense. Guns are also protected specifically by the constitution. I don't need to justify my use, and I most certainly do need to adjust the cosmetics of my gun to suit an emotional response by a totally uninformed anti gunner.

How poorly defined is a definition that used the words it's trying to define to explain it. That's some real intellectual shit.

Sorry but that is not an accurate or legal definition. That could literally be used to ban toy guns. How can you be expected to be taken serious. If I looks like something ban it. That definition only works if you want to outlaw every gun, which we all know is the real agenda of the left.

This part of we all doesn't know. It is nothing more than a hyperbolic term. Like I said main military battle rifles are already not available. So you have yet to show an example.

Define assault rifle? The standard issue battle rifle is not available to the general public without ridiculous fees and administrative paperwork. You most certainly cannot go out and buy them at a local gun shop.

What weapon of war that isn't banned should be. What exactly is a weapon of war? We can't have any of those things you listed, and they don't have historical use or wide use. So basically I'm saying we have pretty good laws right now but lots of state are violating rights. Many of the current laws are in clear violation, also the ATF making laws by changing interpretation is clearly illegal. The truth is they are knowingly and willingly violating the 2nd amendment and the court's will need years to work it out.

Bruen is the correct spelling.

Well there have been lots of current rulings, maybe you should start with that. Basically if it in common use and wide use, and if it's historically consistent. Look at the Heller vs DC and the Bruin vs The state of New York opinions. Those will give you a good understanding of the application of the second amendment. You may disagree with the second amendment but that's on you. The constitution protects the individual. Government is forbidden from doing certain things and taking my guns is one of them.

As all leftists think, you guys are the only ones with intellect. That's why you say smart things like speech is violence and think censorship is necessary. Dismissing an argument based on it having been said. Okay you're the smart one. What a great way to never have to address inconvenient facts.