great points gents, may i add....
Starr I do not believe wins a Natty his TRUE freshmen year, also its really unfair to compare him taking a RS when he had an absolute monster, someone at the time head and shoulders better than him in Mark Hall to contend with, if we look at Dakes Freshmen year at Cornell there are really good wrestlers for him to practice with but absolutely nobody there to contend with for starting 141..... to be even more fair Starr had a National Champion in Mark Hall and 3x finalist, lets be fair, I give Dake the edge in that he wrestled and won his true freshmen year but i also say this...he didnt have a challenge for 141 @ Cornell.... I could see it both ways Starr ahead of Dake (if he wins 5....IF) and I can also see Dake ahead of Starr...... really not fair on Starr to say he had to take a RS year and Dake didnt for this 1 simple reason....Starr had Mark Hall to contend with , Dake had (i have no ideal who @ Cornell) however if Dake went to Iowa there was a guy named Brent Metcalf and I believe Dake would have needed a RS year in that room.....Starr if memory is correct had Mark Hall 1x'mer and 3x'mer finalist, no chance he's coming in and taking over Mr. Hall
I will contend this Starr does not win a Natty his true Freshmen year if we can also agree that while Dake did win a Natty, TFY (True freshmen year), his bracket at Nationals in 2010 was not necessarily a tough bracket, yes there was 2 other top tier guys....Reece, Montell & Dake but the bracket itself may have been the easier of all in 2010.... now a days there might be 3 National champions in a weight class