1032004

She bought it as a “second home.” It just had to be “primarily available” for her use within the first year. After the first year my understanding is she can do whatever she wants with it, and even within the first year rentals are explicitly allowed. And if she visits her family member that lives there, that likely counts as using it. I thought this was a good article summarizing it: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-justice-department-s-dangerously-weak-case-against-letitia-james And a recent development is that Halligan apparently reached out directly to someone else from that outlet, who simply summarized an NY Times article, and Halligan repeatedly told her she was wrong but refused to specify what was wrong. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/anna--lindsey-halligan-here

That doesn’t matter to the case, I can’t tell if you’re being serious about that statement or not.

Well when you don’t have to pay rent you can spend your money on weed

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pardoned-capitol-rioter-charged-threatening-hakeem-jeffries-nyc-trump/

Too bad that school in Norfolk doesn’t still have a team, maybe he could have wrestled there while working his current job

White House Press Secretary using “your mom” jokes

I was hopeful they had actual evidence, but after we let survivors of one of the attacks go free, I’m skeptical.

Yes

I’ve seen some dispute the claim that the family member lived there for free, that James must have been getting rent from them and thus was committing tax fraud. If they are a deadbeat, IMO that supports her claim that James let them live there for free.

It’s impossible to answer who and how much drugs was on the boats? If that’s the case, maybe we shouldn’t be blowing them up. Especially since one of the recent attacks had survivors and we let them go. If we had evidence to try to blow them up, they shouldn’t be allowed to go free. And we’re not working with Venezuela. We’re offering a $50 million reward for the arrest of their president.

What does this have to do with the charges against James?

Why would it be that much different? I guess AJ does like going out of bounds and he couldn’t do that in free, but to get more than one point Wyatt would still need to take him down and not many people can do that

Um, no it’s not. To be clear when I say fantasy matchups I’m talking about “predicting” matches between guys that are like ~20+ years apart.

I don’t really care about the fantasy matchups. I’d give him a shot against Hendrickson if he ever wrestles freestyle though