They’re all full of s**t

[headshuck]

Recent developments.  Out president has begun a campaign of calling this whole thing a hoax put together by democrats, even though the only two people arrested and charged in this case were done so under his previous administration by his department of justice.   And just yesterday the key prosecutor in what was to be the case against Epstein was fired, without being given cause.  
 
Is anyone concerned by this behavior? 

You mean Maureen Comey, daughter of corrupt James Comey? Spicy.

[WrestlingRasta]

4 minutes ago, headshuck said:

You mean Maureen Comey, daughter of corrupt James Comey? Spicy.

Yes, and I knew that would come up, and I saved the following question for that.   She has been his daughter for a very long time.  Our President has had a feud with James Comey for 8 years, well before she was prosecutor on the Epstein case.   She has continued in her position all this time.  Why is she being fired now, without presented cause, right in the middle of the heat of the Epstein situation, at the same time he started calling it a hoax built by the democrats even though the only two people charged in the case were charged by his DOJ?

Do you find that.......spicy?

[headshuck]

I knew you held it back. Not enough info to draw conclusions.

[Bigbrog]

I don't find anything that this administration does to be "spicy".  Disorganized and/or chaotic at times but as expected...as with most administrations.   I do not think the whole Epstein thing is a hoax...it is a disgusting display of deplorable elite behavior and elites and politicians covering it up, on both sides.  Do I think that Trump is on a "list" that shows he is somehow guilty or partaking in the things Epstein was...no...nor do I think someone like Clinton is either.  Are there elites that were taking part...I have no doubt...and that is why I wish everything would come out and folks would be held accountable...but it is also why it isn't coming out.

I also feel some of the criticism towards Trump for not releasing everything is justified as it was something he did run on...however, he does not deserve the full blunt of criticism either as there have been a couple other administrations that didn't release things either.

Plain and simple...release the full files!

[WrestlingRasta]

7 minutes ago, headshuck said:

 Not enough info to draw conclusions.

Since when has that been a prerequisite around here? 

[headshuck]

Ok, I regret the use of the word spicy and even touching this thread.

[WrestlingRasta]

16 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

I don't find anything that this administration does to be "spicy".  Disorganized and/or chaotic at times but as expected...as with most administrations.   I do not think the whole Epstein thing is a hoax...it is a disgusting display of deplorable elite behavior and elites and politicians covering it up, on both sides.  Do I think that Trump is on a "list" that shows he is somehow guilty or partaking in the things Epstein was...no...nor do I think someone like Clinton is either.  Are there elites that were taking part...I have no doubt...and that is why I wish everything would come out and folks would be held accountable...but it is also why it isn't coming out.

I also feel some of the criticism towards Trump for not releasing everything is justified as it was something he did run on...however, he does not deserve the full blunt of criticism either as there have been a couple other administrations that didn't release things either.

Plain and simple...release the full files!

What are your thoughts on his shift into this is a boring subject that no one should be concerned with, and then is a hoax developed by the democrats.  I know you don't believe it is a hoax, but is this new line of messaging concerning?

Edited Thursday at 02:59 PM by WrestlingRasta

[Bigbrog]

57 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

What are your thoughts on his shift into this is a boring subject that no one should be concerned with, and then is a hoax developed by the democrats.  I know you don't believe it is a hoax, but is this new line of messaging concerning?

I guess it isn't "concerning" in terms of the bigger picture.  I absolutely want the people involved with Epstein to be held accountable no matter who they are; however, am I surprised it isn't coming out, no.  As for my thoughts on what Trump has recently said, I have not specifically heard him say that it is boring and/or a hoax so not sure if it is concerning to me or not.  My guess is Trump be playing politics like them politicians always be playing politics, and is trying to do damage control for not doing what he said on his campaign trail...again is it concerning to me, not really given that they all do it no matter what the letter is after their name...do I wish they wouldn't do crap like that...absolutely.

[WrestlingRasta]

3 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

I guess it isn't "concerning" in terms of the bigger picture.  I absolutely want the people involved with Epstein to be held accountable no matter who they are; however, am I surprised it isn't coming out, no.  As for my thoughts on what Trump has recently said, I have not specifically heard him say that it is boring and/or a hoax so not sure if it is concerning to me or not.  My guess is Trump be playing politics like them politicians always be playing politics, and is trying to do damage control for not doing what he said on his campaign trail...again is it concerning to me, not really given that they all do it no matter what the letter is after their name...do I wish they wouldn't do crap like that...absolutely.

Fair enough.   If our President’s behavior and thoughts on the matter are of interest to you, those statements are very easy to find. Thanks for the response.  

[wrestlingguy]

Someone brought up the actual victims on Epstein's island coming forward. But that was shut down with the fact that they signed NDAs. My question is, are NDAs legally binding with minors who have had a crime committed against them?

[ionel]

5 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Someone brought up the actual victims on Epstein's island coming forward. But that was shut down with the fact that they signed NDAs. My question is, are NDAs legally binding with minors who have had a crime committed against them?

I would think not. 

[Gene Mills Fan]

9 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Someone brought up the actual victims on Epstein's island coming forward. But that was shut down with the fact that they signed NDAs. My question is, are NDAs legally binding with minors who have had a crime committed against them?

Most of them knew: why, and what they were getting, to be there; and were compensated financially. Was there any non consenting rape claims in the trials or was it all statutory? I hope that question is not victim blaming.

[Tripnsweep]

[GreatWhiteNorth]

9 hours ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

Most of them knew: why, and what they were getting, to be there; and were compensated financially. Was there any non consenting rape claims in the trials or was it all statutory? I hope that question is not victim blaming.

They were minors! Which means that they were below the legal age for consent.

What the he** is wrong with you!

Adult men raping underage girls is not OK. (I can't believe I have to explain this to you.)

Edited yesterday at 05:34 AM by GreatWhiteNorth