Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. PA is absolutely stupid on this issue. Probably the reason it's getting voted down is because certain politicians need to secure the grower/processor and dispensary permits to certain individuals. I know someone who looked into it and reached out to someone about the process and they point blank said, "Are you related to someone important? If not, no chance in hell. There's going to be a lot of money in this."
  3. Is this the last one or are there more coming?
  4. Yes. He totally screwed the pooch on Covid (Warp Speed, Navy Hospital ships to NYC, not getting rid of Fauci on the first mask reversal, allowing shut downs to be EVEN PROPOSED!!!), being soft on illegal aliens while focusing on the visual of a wall, not draining the swamp, exploding government spending, firing Flynn rather than the top 1000 FBI and CIA political operatives, and many other things. He was OK on tax policy (although SALT deduction should be zero), foreign policy, energy policy, getting out of silly international agreements. The question is why couldn't the Republicans nor the Democrats come up with something more appealing to the American people? When asked by European work colleagues in 2016 who I was going to vote for - it is strange how interested in American politics they are and how they feel it is not to personal a question to ask someone - I would answer thus: "I have stated before that I will vote for a steaming pile of dog feces before voting for Hilary Clinton. And this year I have the opportunity to prove it." I supported other candidates in the contested primaries of 2016 and 2024. Yet the democrats leave me only the option of proving dog feces is preferable to their candidate over and over again. Where is the modern day Sam Nunn, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, etc?
  5. Only the left media, right? All ya’ll are funny. RV, Trip, Caviera, Offmat, Luchador…..yall are very entertaining.
  6. One thing we know for sure, the left would never fabricate a completely fake story and hand it to the press and then without verification they would run it. This would never happen. I think considering the totality of the body of work of the legacy media, we need to give them the benefit of the doubt on this. We also know when the left does fabricate a story they run it by a grand jury first.
  7. Today
  8. Well, as long as he clarified after the lie was so easily disproven. All good.
  9. Border Patrol agent charged with assaulting a police officer and resisting arrest. Had previously been involved with the controversial arrest of a US citizen in a Walmart parking lot. https://www.foxla.com/news/border-patrol-agent-charged-assault-long-beach-pico-rivera-walmart-arrest-isaiah-hodgson
  10. And yet he cannot remeber who appointed Jerome Powell
  11. For some, if you have an autism awareness tattoo, it can get you sent to CECOT. For border patrol agents, if you have gang-related tattoos, NBD as long as they’re covered. https://careers.cbp.gov/s/applicant-resources/cbpo-grooming
  12. He’s already recollected the building sketches from 20 years ago and clarified that he’s specifically never drawn naked lady doodles so he might have recovered on that front.
  13. I’m not sure. I’m not sure what the so called letter is or isn’t. I’m not sure if he’ll actually file the lawsuit. I’m not sure if he files he’d win. I do know telling blatant lies in his response won’t help him win the lawsuit.
  14. 100% of illegal aliens committed a crime.
  15. Do you think he baited them into publishing the story? His lawyers had the $10B lawsuit ready to go.
  16. In all honesty the WSJ releasing this now was pretty suspicious. But then what became more suspicious was Trump responding to it by saying he’s never drawn a picture in his life. Ummmmmm…
  17. He is sounding better. Keep up the fight Ben and belated Happy Birthday!
  18. Why could only Big Bird see Snuffleupagus?
  19. No defense, looking for better offense. Behind a paywall is the best you can do? They allowed Trump to win multiple elections before bringing up the letter?
  20. It is very weird that your defense boils down to "it is behind a paywall so it means nothing"
  21. I think it is bad and petty to remove funding for these items. USAID and NPR have been covered in other threads, but are we really getting rid of Sesame Street? This seems more vindictive than fiscal.
  22. Could you post a link to the letter that the drawing was included with?
  23. Everyone wants to forget the first Trump term. Even Trump.
  24. I wasn’t talking about the WSJ, I was talking about you.
  25. WSJ is a reputable source. There's nothing more to say. This isnt like some random bs that wingers read on the internet. Let's wait and see, but WSJ has a reputation of not making crap up. They actually have standards.
  26. You are seriously no different than the people you pretend to despise. Don’t need to read for yourself or listen to someone in their own words, all you need is to be told what to think and hear what you want to hear and you’re good, you ‘guarantee’ it to be true. Can’t imagine why anyone wants to look at the world through such a small window.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...